Comparisons anchored on GitLab, the open-core DevSecOps platform, against lightweight self-hosted Git forges.
Full DevSecOps suite with paid tiers against a lightweight community Git forge. Compares built-in CI and security scanning, which GitLab features need Premium or Ultimate, Forgejo Actions compatibility, and the hardware and upgrade cadence each demands.
Full DevSecOps suite against a lightweight Go forge: GitLab CE and paid tiers versus MIT Gitea with GitHub Actions compatible CI and a commercial Gitea Enterprise. Compares built-in features, hardware footprint, SAML and audit placement and migration effort.
The three self-hosted Git platforms on most shortlists: licensing and governance, CI compatibility with GitHub Actions, paid features and support windows side by side, with a pick by team size and how much of the DevSecOps toolchain you want in one product.
Which way to install self-managed GitLab: the Linux package (Omnibus), the cloud-native Helm chart on Kubernetes, or the GitLab Operator. Covers what GitLab says about maturity, the external PostgreSQL, Redis and object storage the chart needs, resource overhead, Docker and source installs, and when Kubernetes skills justify the cloud-native route.
When a self-managed GitLab instance can stay a standalone deployment backed by backups and when to build one of GitLab's high availability reference architectures. Covers GitLab's user and RPS thresholds, the Linux package, Cloud Native Hybrid and Cloud Native architectures, which components may run in Kubernetes, and when Geo is worth it.
Which GitLab package to install on your own servers: the MIT-only Community Edition or the Enterprise Edition build that runs the Free tier without a license and unlocks Premium or Ultimate with an activation code, and what happens to an EE instance when a subscription lapses.
Which GitLab tier a self-managed instance needs: what Free covers, what Premium adds for code review controls, LDAP group sync and Geo disaster recovery, and when Ultimate's security testing, vulnerability management and compliance features justify custom pricing.
Whether to run your own GitLab instance or use GitLab.com, the multi-tenant SaaS: hosting location, Free tier user limits, compute minutes and storage caps, who runs upgrades, and why a subscription cannot simply move from one to the other.
For regulated teams choosing between GitLab's single-tenant hosted service on AWS and running GitLab themselves: region and key control, the Ultimate-only feature set, the authentication and Git hook features Dedicated does not offer, and what happens to data when a subscription ends.
GitLab's built-in CI/CD against a standalone Jenkins controller with more than 2,300 plugins: pipeline definition, runners and agents, plugin maintenance, security patching, licensing of paid GitLab tiers and the cost of running two systems instead of one.
Choosing how self-managed GitLab runs jobs: the Docker executor on runner hosts against the Kubernetes executor that creates a pod per job, on isolation, autoscaling, caching and clone reuse, debugging and the infrastructure each needs.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.