Magento Open Source vs WooCommerce: which to choose

Magento Open Source vs WooCommerce: which fits your store

Choose Magento Open Source when the catalog, order volume or B2B logic will outgrow a WordPress-hosted shop, and when you can staff a PHP application with search, cache and queue services behind it. Choose WooCommerce when the business already runs WordPress, the store is a modest extension of a content site, and the team wants ecommerce to ride on the same hosting, plugins and update habits. Both cores are free to download and run: WooCommerce is licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later, and Magento Open Source is licensed under the Open Software License 3.0 (OSL-3.0). Neither core carries a mandatory license fee, so the real cost sits in hosting, extensions, implementation and upkeep.

The decision turns on four questions. First, what catalog and order scale do you expect in the next two to three years, and do you have load figures to test against? Second, does your organization already run WordPress, with people who maintain it? Third, can you support the Magento stack, which the Adobe requirements for 2.4.9 list as PHP 8.5, MariaDB or MySQL 8.4, OpenSearch 3, RabbitMQ 4.3 and Valkey 9, or do you prefer the smaller WordPress footprint, which WooCommerce documents as PHP 8.3 or greater and MySQL 8.0 or MariaDB 10.6 or greater? Fourth, how often will you upgrade? Magento's 2.4.x releases carry dated standard support windows, so confirm the release line you plan to run against the lifecycle policy before you commit.

Run a short test before you decide. Ask your team to name who will own search tuning, cache configuration and queue monitoring after go-live, and ask a partner to price a fixed-scope proof of concept against your real product data and checkout flow. If the answers point to a large catalog and a skilled platform team, Magento is the stronger base. If they point to a small team already fluent in WordPress, WooCommerce is usually the lower-effort path, provided you accept its plugin-driven model and check that your extensions are maintained.

When Magento Open Source vs WooCommerce fits a given store

This table matches common store scenarios to the platform that usually fits better, with the reason and the condition under which the other platform would win. Read each row against your own catalog size, pricing rules, team and hosting plans, because the fit depends on those conditions more than on the platform name.

Store scenario	Better fit and reason	The other platform wins when
A content-led store on WordPress	WooCommerce, because the shop sits inside an existing WordPress site that editors already use for articles, landing pages and plugins, so one stack and one update routine cover both.	Commerce logic grows beyond what WooCommerce plugins handle, or the store needs a dedicated ecommerce architecture with its own service stack and order workflows.
A catalog with complex pricing and B2B rules	Magento Open Source, because its built-in catalog, pricing and customer group model is designed for large catalogs and layered rules, though many B2B features still need extensions or custom work.	Pricing needs are modest and the team wants fewer moving parts, since WooCommerce with a small set of well-maintained extensions can cover simpler B2B terms.
A multi-store group	Magento Open Source, because one installation can manage several store views and websites with shared catalog and separate configuration, which suits groups that want central control.	Each brand is small and independent, so separate WooCommerce sites with their own plugins and hosting are simpler to run and hand off.
A small merchant with a single site owner	WooCommerce, because a single owner can manage content, products and orders in one familiar admin without running search, cache or queue services.	The business expects rapid growth in catalog or order volume and plans to hire platform engineers, which makes a dedicated ecommerce platform easier to justify.
A team with no platform engineers	WooCommerce, because routine updates, plugins and hosting can be handled by a generalist web team, and the operating footprint is smaller.	The team plans to contract an implementation partner for hardening, upgrades and performance work, in which case Magento Open Source can still be run, but the ongoing support budget must cover it.

How each platform is built and what that means for operations

Magento Open Source and WooCommerce both run a PHP storefront on a database, but they ask for very different supporting services. The cards below cover the application stack, data layer, search, caching and queues, and hosting shape, with what each choice means for patching and monitoring. Check each requirement against the version you plan to run before you size infrastructure.

Application stack and PHP version

Magento Open Source 2.4.9 requires PHP 8.5, and Adobe supports only the listed combinations of PHP, database, search, cache and queue versions. WooCommerce recommends PHP 8.3 or greater on top of WordPress 6.9 or greater, so the PHP upgrade path is a different decision on each side. For Magento, a PHP move is a platform change that must be tested against your extensions. For WooCommerce, check that every plugin and theme in use supports the PHP version your host provides before you upgrade.

Relational data layer

Magento Open Source 2.4.9 runs on MariaDB or MySQL 8.4, and Adobe lists MariaDB 12.3 as recommended with 11.8 also supported. WooCommerce needs MySQL 8.0 or later, or MariaDB 10.6 or later, and from WooCommerce 8.2 High-Performance Order Storage is enabled by default for new installations, placing orders in dedicated tables such as wc_orders. Confirm which order storage mode a WooCommerce site uses before planning reports or database backups, since existing sites may still run on legacy post-based storage.

Search, cache and queue services

Magento Open Source 2.4.9 requires OpenSearch 3 for catalog search, RabbitMQ 4.3 for message queues and Valkey 9 for Redis-compatible caching. Each service is a separate component you must patch, back up and monitor alongside the store. WooCommerce runs its catalog search and background jobs inside WordPress and its database, so it has fewer moving parts but less separation between store load and site load. Ask who owns each service in your team before choosing Magento.

Full-page caching and web server

Adobe documents Varnish as the full-page cache for self-managed Magento installations, and its 2.4.9 requirements list nginx 1.30 on Linux x86-64. Cache rules, purge logic and Content Security Policy headers become part of your change process. WooCommerce usually depends on the web server and WordPress caching plugins, and cart and account pages often need to bypass cache. Test checkout behavior after every cache or web server change on either platform.

Patching and version support

Adobe releases a full patch for the 2.4.x LTS line each May and ships security patches at least annually for supported lines, and standard support for 2.4.9 runs until May 31, 2029. WordPress supports only the most recent release in its 7.1 series, and WooCommerce 11.2.1 followed 11.2.0 within days in October 2026. Magento upgrades touch the PHP, database and search stack together, while WooCommerce upgrades often arrive as frequent plugin and core updates. Schedule a test environment that mirrors production for each.

Monitoring and operational ownership

A Magento store has at least four services to watch: the PHP application, the database, OpenSearch and RabbitMQ, plus the cache layer. Your monitoring must cover queue backlogs and index health, not only web response times. A WooCommerce store concentrates most signals in one WordPress and PHP stack, which is simpler to observe but still needs checks for failed scheduled actions and plugin conflicts. Confirm with your platform team whether they already run OpenSearch and message queues before you choose.

Feature comparison: catalog scale, APIs, security and maintenance

This table compares Magento Open Source and WooCommerce on the capabilities that shape a self-hosted build: data model, API, caching, security handling, license and support windows. Rows with no supplied fact tell you what to confirm with each vendor or in a proof of concept, so treat those as open questions rather than settled answers.

Capability	Magento Open Source	WooCommerce
Catalog and order scale	Built as a standalone ecommerce platform; confirm catalog and order volume limits against your own load test before committing	Runs inside WordPress; confirm catalog and order volume limits against your own hosting and load test
Data model and order storage	Standalone application with its own data model; confirm the order schema and any migration path with your implementation partner	Orders can be stored in dedicated tables under High-Performance Order Storage, stable and enabled by default for new installations from WooCommerce 8.2
API surface	GraphQL and REST APIs for storefront and admin; confirm which endpoints your integrations need	REST API under the wc/v3 namespace, authenticated with API keys over HTTPS or OAuth 1.0a
Caching model	Varnish is documented as the full-page cache accelerator for self-managed installations	Caching depends on the WordPress host and plugins; confirm the page cache and object cache setup with your host
Content Security Policy support	Supported from 2.3.5; from 2.4.7, restrict mode is on by default on storefront and admin payment pages	Confirm CSP header support and configuration with the WooCommerce documentation and your own plugin set
Security reporting route	Confirm the current vulnerability disclosure channel and patch notices with Adobe before deployment	Security issues are reported through Automattic's HackerOne program
License	Open Software License 3.0 (OSL-3.0), with AFL 3.0 also included in the distribution	GNU General Public License version 2 or later (GPL-2.0-or-later)
Maintenance support window	Magento Open Source 2.4.9 has standard support until May 31, 2029, per Adobe's lifecycle policy	Confirm the support window for your WooCommerce and WordPress versions; WooCommerce releases follow the WordPress version it requires

What the licenses and editions include for each platform

Magento Open Source source files are licensed under the Open Software License 3.0 (OSL-3.0), and the distribution also includes the Academic Free License 3.0 (AFL-3.0). You can use and host the software without a license fee for the code itself. Adobe sells Adobe Commerce as the commercial edition built on the same codebase, and the features, support terms and hosting options it adds are set out in Adobe's edition documentation, which you should compare against your own requirements before you decide.

Code license: OSL-3.0 covers the source files, and AFL-3.0 ships in the same distribution. Have counsel confirm how these terms apply to your custom modules and to any themes you buy.
Paid edition: Adobe Commerce is the licensed product. Confirm in writing which features, support levels and deployment options come with it, because this page does not list them.
Support window: Standard support for 2.4.9 runs until May 31, 2029, according to Adobe's lifecycle policy. Ask Adobe which security patches and support apply to Open Source installations specifically.
Third-party modules: Marketplace extensions carry licenses set by their vendors. Check each one's terms, update policy and compatibility statement before it enters your build.

Ask Adobe and each module vendor for the license text and support terms that apply to your exact configuration.

How extensions, customization and identity integration differ

Magento Open Source is extended through modules that hook into the platform's service layer, and most third-party work arrives as packages installed alongside the magento2 core repository. The core is licensed under OSL-3.0 with AFL-3.0 also included in the distribution, but each module carries its own license, so a store can run code under several licenses at once. Before adopting an extension, check its license, its declared compatibility with Magento Open Source 2.4.9 and the PHP, OpenSearch, RabbitMQ and Valkey versions in your stack, and whether the vendor ships updates for each core release line. Treat every module as recurring upgrade work, because each one must be retested after core patches.

WooCommerce extends through plugins that run inside WordPress, distributed through the WordPress plugin directory, WooCommerce.com or vendor sites. WooCommerce core is GPL-2.0-or-later, but plugin licenses vary, so read each one's license file before you depend on it. For integration, WooCommerce 2.6 and later exposes the wc/v3 namespace, which requires WooCommerce 3.5 or later and WordPress 4.4 or later and authenticates with API keys over HTTPS or OAuth 1.0a. Magento offers both GraphQL and REST. The 2.4.9 release notes state that the clearCart GraphQL mutation, previously Adobe Commerce only, is now available in Open Source. Confirm the endpoints and authentication method your integration needs in the WooCommerce REST API documentation for the exact version you deploy.

Identity integration is largely delivered by extensions on both platforms, so the answer depends on which add-on you install. Admin and customer login options, including single sign-on and directory support, come from the modules or plugins you choose, and each one has its own compatibility limits against PHP and core versions. Ask each vendor for written confirmation of the protocols and directory features they support in the exact extension version you plan to run, then test login, role mapping and account deprovisioning in staging. Extension count matters more than code quality only when the business needs many niche integrations quickly and accepts maintaining each one. For a narrow, regulated integration set, a few well-maintained extensions often cost less to keep patched over the life of the store.

What drives the running cost of each platform

Running cost for both platforms is mostly people and services, not the software licence, since both are free to download. The cards below separate what is paid once from what recurs, and what to request in writing before comparing quotes for Magento Open Source and WooCommerce.

Infrastructure and hosting tier

Magento Open Source needs PHP, a MySQL or MariaDB database, OpenSearch, Valkey or Redis, RabbitMQ and nginx, and the Adobe requirements list recommends Varnish for self-managed installs. Those are separate services to size, patch and monitor, and they recur every month. WooCommerce runs on a WordPress hosting tier that can be far lighter, but a busy store still needs memory, database capacity and caching. Ask the hosting provider which components are included and which are billed separately.

Skills and staffing

Running Magento well usually means someone who can manage PHP services, search indexing, queues and cache tuning, plus a developer who can ship theme and module changes. WooCommerce can be run by a WordPress-literate administrator for simple stores, but complex catalogs and integrations still need developers. This is typically the largest recurring cost. Ask any partner to state the roles assumed, the hours per month for maintenance, and who is on call for incidents.

Paid extensions and themes

Both ecosystems mix free and paid extensions. Paid plugins and themes bill an annual or per-site licence that renews, and each one adds update and compatibility work when core changes. Magento modules often need code review before each upgrade, while WooCommerce add-ons frequently ship their own update cycle. Count paid components per platform, record each renewal date, and confirm that the vendor supports the target core version.

Support contracts

Neither platform's core includes a support contract in the sense enterprises expect. Adobe Commerce support is a separate licensed purchase, and WooCommerce.com premium support covers products bought from that store. Magento Open Source users who want guaranteed response times must buy support from a third party or a partner, which is a recurring fixed-scope or retainer cost. Ask whether support covers code, hosting, or both, and what response windows apply.

Upgrade and testing effort

Magento releases arrive on a fixed annual patch rhythm within each 2.4.x line, and each upgrade means testing custom code, extensions, the database schema and performance on the new PHP and service versions. WooCommerce updates are more frequent and smaller, but every plugin update still needs regression testing against the store's checkout and payment flows. Budget a recurring test environment and a staging cycle for both. Ask for a written upgrade plan with test scope and rollback steps.

Edition and fair usage thresholds

Magento Open Source has no revenue or order threshold for use, so its cost is driven by services and people. WooCommerce is also GPL and free, but its own paid extensions and hosting tiers scale with store size. Some competing platforms do change tier at revenue thresholds, which matters when a store is growing fast, but that does not apply to these two. Before signing, confirm whether any planned extension or hosting plan has volume-based pricing that will change as orders grow.

Moving a store from WooCommerce to Magento Open Source or back

The sequence below takes a store from inventory through data mapping, rebuild, parallel running and cutover to decommissioning, so the team knows what moves, what gets rebuilt and when the old platform can be switched off. The order applies in either direction, though the mapping work runs against different data models.

Inventory products, customers, orders and business rules
The store owner and the lead developer list everything the current store does: product types and attributes, customer accounts and groups, order history and retention needs, tax and shipping rules, coupons, and every plugin or module that changes behavior. Each item is tagged as keep, rebuild or retire. The inventory is done when the business owner has signed off on it and every integration has a named owner on each side.
Map data between the two models
The developer maps WooCommerce objects (posts-based products, variations, WordPress users, and orders stored in the High-Performance Order Storage tables when that option is active) to Magento's catalog, customer and sales entities. Attribute sets, tax classes, customer groups and order statuses are matched one to one, and anything without a clean equivalent is flagged for a decision. The mapping is done when a written field-level map exists and the team agrees which fields are lossy.
Confirm migration tooling and its support status
Before writing custom scripts, the team asks each vendor, and any tooling provider, which migration tools exist for the exact source and target versions, which data types they cover and whether they are supported or community-maintained. The answer is recorded alongside the version pins for both platforms. This step is done when the team can show a written response for each tool it plans to use, and it does not assume that a tool supports a given data type.
Rebuild the theme, checkout and custom code
Developers rebuild the storefront theme on Magento's front end and reimplement custom WordPress plugins as Magento modules or service integrations. Payment and shipping connectors are set up again against the target platform's APIs and sandbox accounts, and checkout is tested end to end with real tax and shipping rules. Nothing carries over automatically from the theme or plugin layer. The step is done when the test plan passes for checkout, returns and tax calculation in staging.
Migrate test data and reconcile counts
The team runs the migration scripts against a copy of production data, then reconciles record counts, totals and sample orders between the source and the target. Mismatches in tax, rounding, customer passwords or order status are logged and fixed before the next run. Products and customers usually move with the clearest mapping, while historical orders depend on how cleanly their fields map. The step is done when repeated test runs reconcile without unexplained differences.
Run both stores in parallel and cut over
The team runs the new store alongside the old one for a period agreed in advance, checking order flow, inventory sync, search, email notifications and reporting in both. A final delta sync moves the latest products, customers and orders at a planned freeze point, then DNS, payment webhooks and integrations are switched. The step is done when the new store is taking live orders and the cutover runbook has been signed off with rollback steps recorded.
Decommission the old platform
Once the store has run cleanly on the new platform, the team archives the old database and files under the retention policy, revokes API keys and webhook secrets, removes the old hosting or plugin licenses that are no longer needed, and updates redirects and documentation. The final check is a retention record showing what was archived, where, and who can restore it. The step is done when the old environment is retired and the archive is verified.

Where Magento and WooCommerce projects usually run long

Magento Open Source projects usually run long in environment setup and the upgrade cycle. A self-managed installation needs PHP 8.5, MariaDB or MySQL 8.4, OpenSearch 3, RabbitMQ 4.3, Valkey 9, Composer 2.10 and nginx 1.30 on Linux x86-64, and Adobe supports only the listed combinations, so the service stack must be built and tested as one unit before any storefront work begins. Confirm the requirements for your chosen release line against the Adobe Commerce system requirements early, because the 2.4.8-p5 line lists PHP 8.4 or 8.3 and Varnish 8, which is a different stack from 2.4.9. Theme development and extension compatibility checks then need to be repeated against each patch and release, and the annual full patch for the 2.4.x LTS line is the window most teams plan their maintenance around. Budget for that recurring work, and ask any implementation partner to show the compatibility test plan for every extension in scope.

WooCommerce projects usually run long in plugin interactions and the update cadence of WordPress itself. Because WooCommerce is a plugin, every WordPress core release, WooCommerce release and third-party extension update can change checkout, tax or shipping behavior, so conflicts tend to surface after go-live rather than during build. Test a staging copy against the current WordPress and WooCommerce versions before each update, and confirm the PHP and database versions in your environment meet the WooCommerce server requirements. Order storage is a setting teams often overlook: High-Performance Order Storage has been enabled by default for new installations since WooCommerce 8.2, but older stores may still store orders in the posts tables, and moving them is a migration step that should be scheduled and tested rather than assumed.

Across both platforms, the same four areas cause most schedule slips. Integrations with ERP, payment, tax and fulfillment systems take longer than estimated because the API contracts and error handling are often undocumented, and the WooCommerce REST API under the wc/v3 namespace still needs authentication and rate handling designed by the project. Data migration slips when product attributes, customer records and historical orders do not map cleanly. Performance testing is frequently squeezed at the end, even though cache layers such as Varnish for self-managed Magento and the database tuning for WooCommerce change results materially. Undocumented customizations inherited from a previous developer are the most expensive surprise, so ask for a full inventory of custom code, theme overrides and direct database changes before fixing the scope in writing.

Questions buyers ask before choosing or hiring help

How much does it cost to run Magento Open Source compared with WooCommerce?

Both platforms are free to download, so running cost comes from the infrastructure, services and people around them. Magento Open Source is licensed under OSL-3.0, and its 2.4.9 requirements list PHP 8.5, MariaDB or MySQL 8.4, OpenSearch 3, RabbitMQ 4.3 and Valkey 9, plus nginx and Composer. Each service is a component to host, patch and monitor, and a self-managed store also needs Varnish for full-page caching. WooCommerce is GPL-2.0-or-later and runs inside WordPress, so its stack is smaller: PHP 8.3 or greater, MySQL 8.0 or MariaDB 10.6 or greater, and a WordPress memory limit of 256 MB or more. Recurring costs come from hosting size, paid extensions, support and the staff hours needed to keep versions current. Ask any quote to separate one-time build work from recurring hosting, support and upgrade work.

How long does a platform change take and what drives the time?

No fixed duration applies to either platform, because the time depends on the data, the design and the integrations involved. The largest drivers are catalog size and data quality, the number of custom checkout, tax and shipping rules, and the ERP, payment and fulfillment systems the store must connect to. Platform choice shifts the work: Magento usually needs more custom front-end and extension work to reach a given feature set, while WooCommerce inherits much of its behavior from WordPress themes and plugins. Order, customer and URL migration needs its own test cycles, and the schedule should also cover staging, load testing and cutover. Ask for a fixed-scope quote that lists the integrations, the data to move and the test plan. DeployOpen agrees scope, deliverables and timelines in writing before work starts.

Can an in-house team run Magento Open Source or WooCommerce?

A team with PHP and WordPress skills can usually run WooCommerce for a small or mid-sized store. Magento Open Source generally needs deeper PHP, Linux, search and caching skills, because its 2.4.9 stack places OpenSearch, RabbitMQ, Valkey and Varnish under the storefront. Each of those services needs configuration, monitoring and patching. WooCommerce runs on the WordPress stack, so staff who maintain a WordPress site can often handle routine plugin and theme work, though payment and tax setups still need care. Before deciding, confirm three things: whether someone can own the Magento service stack after go-live, whether on-call coverage exists for peak trading, and whether a skills gap is better filled by a partner. DeployOpen offers retainers for ongoing support and upgrades, so an in-house team can keep ownership while outsourcing specific tasks.

What does the business need to provide for either platform project?

The business has to set the scope, own the product data and approve the processes, and these inputs shape the work more than the platform does. Product information, pricing rules, tax and shipping tables, and customer data need an owner who can answer questions quickly during migration. Merchandising, finance and fulfillment teams should agree on order flows, refunds and returns before the build starts, because changes after design are where budgets tend to move. Expect to name a product owner, a technical contact who can grant access to hosting and payment accounts, and someone who signs off test results. Both platforms need these inputs, but Magento's larger feature set generally means more decisions to record. Put each responsibility in the written scope and ask the quote to show which party handles it.

Can WooCommerce handle a large product catalog and order volume?

WooCommerce can run large catalogs, but the limit usually comes from hosting, the database and plugin load. No supplied benchmark sets a product count that WooCommerce can or cannot handle. High-Performance Order Storage has been stable and enabled by default for new installations since WooCommerce 8.2, and it stores orders in dedicated tables such as wc_orders and wc_orders_meta. Stores that predate that setting, or that run heavy custom reporting, should test order queries and indexing before launch. Magento Open Source also needs its search and caching services sized for the store's own catalog, so the infrastructure cost grows with volume on both sides. Load test both stacks with your real catalog, peak order rate and planned integrations, then compare the results against the quote. Ask any provider to state the tested volume and the hosting tier behind it.

How do upgrades differ between Magento Open Source and WooCommerce?

Magento upgrades are planned release-line work, while WooCommerce upgrades follow the WordPress and plugin release cycle. Magento 2.4.9 has standard support until May 31, 2029, and Adobe ships a full patch for the 2.4.x LTS line annually in May, with security patches at least annually for supported lines. Each Magento release can also move PHP, OpenSearch, RabbitMQ and Valkey versions, so an upgrade may change the stack as well as the code. WordPress 7.1.3 was released on October 6, 2026, and the WordPress releases archive says only the most recent release in a series is actively maintained. WooCommerce 11.2.1 followed 11.2.0 two days later, so a WooCommerce store should track current WordPress, PHP and WooCommerce releases closely. Budget regression testing of extensions and custom code for every upgrade on both platforms.

Do I need a partner to implement either platform?

A partner is not required for either platform, but one becomes useful when the in-house team lacks the time or skills for the build, migration or ongoing upgrades. Some teams need help with the Magento service stack, security hardening or migration from another system, while others only need a short review of a WooCommerce setup. DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades and supports self-hosted open-source platforms inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped networks, and most engagements are fixed-scope. DeployOpen is not an official partner, reseller or certified provider of Adobe or Automattic, and it does not issue audit reports or certifications. Ongoing support and upgrades are available as retainers. A written scope shows which tasks stay with your team and which the partner takes on.

How DeployOpen helps choose, implement or migrate

DeployOpen plans, implements, customizes, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades, documents and supports self-hosted open-source platforms inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped networks. For a Magento Open Source vs WooCommerce decision, we work from your catalog, order volume, integrations and team skills to produce a written, fixed-scope plan before any build starts.

How we scope

We document catalog size, order volume, peak traffic and integration inventory before recommending either platform.
The written scope names the Magento or WooCommerce version, PHP and database targets, and the hosting stack in your environment.
We agree deliverables, timelines and exclusions in writing before work starts, including who maintains extensions after handover.

How we build

We build the hosting stack from your requirements, including search, cache, queue and database components for Magento Open Source.
We assess extension and plugin dependencies, then test custom code and third-party modules against the agreed versions.
We run security testing of the storefront, admin and APIs, and document the configuration we deliver for your review.

How we hand over

Handover includes architecture notes, runbooks for deployment and upgrades, and documented backup and restore procedures.
We deliver the upgrade path and a rollback plan so your team can estimate the effort of future platform version changes.
We prepare compliance-ready evidence and controls where your assessor needs them, while auditors issue any formal opinion.

How we support

Ongoing support, upgrades and continuous testing are available as retainers after the initial fixed-scope engagement ends.
A retainer can cover patch application, version upgrades and recurring security testing as your release schedule requires.
Ask any quote to separate one-time implementation work from the recurring support and testing your team will need.

Magento Open Source vs WooCommerce