Comparisons anchored on XWiki, the LGPL structured enterprise wiki, against lighter documentation tools.
Enterprise structured wiki or simple documentation shelf: XWiki's fine-grained rights, structured data and paid Pro apps against BookStack's MIT book and chapter model, with a verdict by content volume, permission complexity and Confluence-style needs.
Java enterprise wiki against a Node.js Markdown wiki: XWiki's parallel maintained branches and structured pages versus Wiki.js 2.x, whose successor 3.0 is still in beta, weighed by long-term maintenance risk, database support and editing style.
The three self-hosted wikis teams shortlist when replacing Confluence: licensing, stack, editors, permissions and SSO side by side, plus maintenance risk from Wiki.js 3.0 still in beta, with a pick by content volume and permission needs.
XWiki Standard, the free open-source wiki, against XWiki Pro from XWiki SAS: the Pro apps and connectors bundled with Pro subscriptions, the Starter to Enterprise tiers and user caps, support channels and hours, and the plans that include the Confluence migration toolkit.
XWiki Cloud from XWiki SAS against running XWiki on your own servers: OVHcloud hosting in France, who handles installation, upgrades and backups, the yearly cloud upgrade policy, limits on customization and direct access, and identical Pro pricing either way.
Enterprise structured wiki against the wiki engine behind Wikipedia: compares XWiki and MediaWiki on permissions, structured data, editing experience, SSO through extensions, LTS policies and the effort to run each for internal documentation.
XWiki's structured enterprise wiki and extension ecosystem against Docmost's newer AGPL collaborative editor, for teams leaving Confluence: import paths, real-time editing, which SSO and permission features sit in paid editions, and the Java versus Node.js stack.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.