ERPNext or Dolibarr: which fits your ERP scope
ERPNext fits a growing manufacturer or an operation that runs several modules together, such as inventory, manufacturing, purchasing, sales and accounting in one data model. Dolibarr fits a small services firm or an association that needs invoicing, contacts, projects and membership tracking, and wants to switch on only the modules it uses. Both are licensed under GPL-3.0, so the license will not separate them. The decision turns on three things: how deep your module needs go, what your hosting environment can run, and whether your team can own add-ons and upgrades after go-live. Start with module depth. List the processes that must work on day one and the ones you expect to add within two years, then map each to the modules each platform ships. ERPNext is built around a full suite on the Frappe Framework, so cross-module workflows such as work orders feeding stock and costing are its strength. Dolibarr's modular PHP design keeps the footprint smaller, which suits a narrower scope. Ask each vendor to demonstrate your three hardest processes in a trial instance, not a generic demo.
Next, check stack and hosting capacity. ERPNext on the Frappe Framework v16 requires MariaDB 11.8, Redis or Valkey 6 or later, Python 3.14 and Node.js 24, as listed in the Frappe installation documentation. Dolibarr runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which many shared or existing hosting setups already provide. If your infrastructure team does not operate Python and Node services, budget for that skill gap or consider a managed option for ERPNext. Finally, assess in-house skills. Customization on either platform means writing code or modules, and each upgrade must be tested against your custom work. Confirm who will maintain custom DocTypes, add-on modules or Dolibarr modules after handover, and what your own staff can absorb. DeployOpen plans, implements, hardens and documents self-hosted deployments of both, and scopes each engagement in writing before work begins.
Which platform fits which scenario
This table matches common business profiles to the platform that usually fits better, with the condition that drives each choice. Read each row by asking which condition describes your organization, then check the items to confirm before you commit. The main takeaway is that ERPNext favors process depth and a Python and JavaScript-capable team, while Dolibarr favors a lighter, modular suite that a small team can run with fewer technical dependencies.
| Scenario | Better fit | Driving condition and what to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Growing manufacturer with production and inventory | ERPNext | Fits when bills of materials, work orders, stock valuation and multi-step production matter. Confirm module depth for your costing method and your integration needs with shop-floor systems. |
| Small services firm with projects and invoicing | Dolibarr | Fits when the need is quoting, invoicing, project tracking and basic accounting with few moving parts. Confirm the specific project and billing modules you need are enabled in your edition. |
| Association with memberships and subscriptions | Dolibarr | Its modular design lets a membership-focused organization enable only the modules it uses. Confirm membership renewal, dues and member portal needs against the current module list. |
| Team with no Python or JavaScript skills | Dolibarr | Its PHP base and Module Builder suit teams that customize through configuration rather than framework code. Confirm who will maintain customizations and whether an implementation partner will cover them. |
| Team with Python and JavaScript developers | ERPNext | The Frappe Framework is a Python and JavaScript stack, so in-house developers can extend doctypes and apps directly. Confirm the Python and Node.js versions required by the release you plan to run. |
| Organization wanting a managed hosting option | ERPNext | Frappe Cloud is the vendor's managed hosting for ERPNext. Confirm its availability, data location and support terms with the vendor, since these are outside the facts supplied here. |
| Self-hosted deployment on existing PHP and MySQL or PostgreSQL infrastructure | Dolibarr | Dolibarr runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which may match existing database operations. Confirm your PHP version and hosting model against the release notes for the line you select. |
| Organization with a multi-year upgrade plan and a dedicated platform team | ERPNext | ERPNext releases are frequent, and the v15 line still received releases in 2026. Plan for version upgrades and test your customizations on each release, whichever platform you choose. |
How ERPNext on Frappe and Dolibarr are built
ERPNext and Dolibarr differ most in the framework underneath and in who runs the stack. ERPNext sits on the Frappe Framework, so the framework, its database and cache services and the hosting model shape each other. Dolibarr is a single PHP application with modules switched on as needed, which keeps the moving parts closer to what a small IT team already runs.
Frappe Framework underneath ERPNext
ERPNext is GPL-3.0 software running on the Frappe Framework, a full-stack framework written in Python and JavaScript and licensed under MIT. Your developers customize ERPNext through that framework, so Python and JavaScript skills matter more than PHP skills for this platform. Check that your team can maintain both layers and that any custom apps follow the framework's upgrade path before you commit to a design.
Frappe v16 stack requirements
For Frappe Framework v16, the stack reference is MariaDB 11.8, Redis or Valkey 6 or later, Python 3.14 and Node.js 24. Treat these as the baseline for an ERPNext v16 deployment, and confirm them against the documentation for the exact ERPNext version you plan to run. Ask your platform team whether they already support these runtimes, because older Python or Node.js versions in your standard images can block the upgrade path.
Dolibarr as a modular PHP suite
Dolibarr is a modular PHP application that runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL. You enable only the modules a business needs, so a small services firm can start with invoicing, contacts and projects without adopting the full footprint of a larger ERP. Customization happens in PHP modules and the low-code Module Builder, so check that your team can review and patch that code over time.
Self-hosting ERPNext with Frappe Docker
Frappe Docker lets you self-host ERPNext in your own containers and cloud account, which suits organizations that need the data inside their own network. The operations stay with you: image builds, database and cache services, backups, monitoring and each upgrade between ERPNext releases. Confirm who on your team owns that run book before choosing this path, and write down the recovery steps you expect to test.
Frappe Cloud managed hosting
Frappe Cloud is the vendor's managed hosting for ERPNext and handles installation, upgrades, monitoring and support. That removes most of the run book from your team, but it places hosting under a vendor agreement. Ask where data is stored, what support covers, how backups can be exported and what happens to your data if you leave. Those answers decide whether managed hosting fits a regulated environment.
Running a PHP suite in production
Self-hosting Dolibarr means operating a PHP web application, its database and its background tasks on infrastructure you control. Plan for web server and PHP runtime patching, database backups and a test copy for every module change. Track the release line too: 24.0.1 followed 24.0.0 on September 7, 2026, while 23.0 and 22.0 still received maintenance releases in 2026, so decide which line you will stay on.
Module depth, extensibility and identity integration compared
This table compares ERPNext and Dolibarr on module breadth, customization model, add-on ecosystem, identity integration and release cadence. Read each row against your own process list, and treat any cell marked for confirmation as an open question to put to the vendor before shortlisting.
| Capability | ERPNext (Frappe Framework) | Dolibarr |
|---|---|---|
| Module breadth | Full ERP suite built on the Frappe Framework, covering the ERP scope a manufacturer typically runs, with module depth to confirm against your own process map | Modular suite where you enable only the modules you need, suited to smaller scopes such as invoicing, membership and services work |
| Customization approach | Customization through the Frappe Framework, a full-stack Python and JavaScript framework that needs developer skills for deep changes | Extended through the Module Builder, a low-code tool, plus PHP modules for changes beyond its scope |
| Add-on marketplace | Extensions are delivered as Frappe apps alongside the core suite; confirm the current catalog and maintenance status of each app with the vendor | Add-ons are sourced through the DoliStore marketplace; confirm each add-on's version compatibility and vendor support before purchase |
| Identity and single sign-on | Confirm supported SSO protocols and identity provider connectors for the Frappe version you plan to run with your vendor or in a test environment | Confirm SSO and directory integration options for your Dolibarr version and whether they come from core or a marketplace add-on |
| Release cadence | Major lines such as v16.0.0 (January 12, 2026) with frequent patch releases, including v16.51.1 (October 15, 2026) | Major lines such as 24.0.0 (August 20, 2026) and 24.0.1 (September 7, 2026), with older lines such as 23.0 and 22.0 still receiving maintenance releases |
| Stack to operate | Requires Frappe Framework v16 with MariaDB 11.8, Redis or Valkey 6 or later, Python 3.14 and Node.js 24 | Runs as a PHP application on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which suits a simpler hosting footprint |
What is free and what is paid in each platform
ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0, which governs how you may use, modify and redistribute the application. It runs on the Frappe Framework, which is licensed under MIT, so your stack includes two licensed components that you should review together with your legal team. The release lines also shape maintenance effort, because the v16 and v15 lines were both receiving releases in October 2026.
- Application license: GPL-3.0 covers ERPNext itself. Ask counsel how it applies to your custom modules and to any third-party code you bundle.
- Framework license: The Frappe Framework is MIT licensed, a permissive license that you should review alongside GPL-3.0 for your own code.
- Current release lines: ERPNext v16.51.1 was released on October 15, 2026, and the v15 line still received v15.123.0 on October 14, 2026.
- Paid tiers: Ask the vendor whether any paid edition, module or support package exists, and what it covers.
- Managed hosting: Frappe Cloud is the vendor's managed hosting option. Request its current terms in writing before you budget for it.
Confirm which costs are one-time and which recur, including any support or hosting fees, before you commit to a platform.
Dolibarr is free open source software under the GPL, and its GitHub repository lists GPL-3.0. The Dolibarr Association, founded in 2009, supports the project, so the governance behind the software is a nonprofit body rather than a single commercial vendor. Its release history shows active lines in 2026, which helps you plan upgrade cycles.
- Application license: GPL-3.0 applies to Dolibarr itself. Confirm how it applies to custom modules you build with the Module Builder.
- Association role: The Dolibarr Association, founded in 2009, supports the project. Ask what services, if any, it sells alongside the software.
- Current release: Dolibarr 24.0.0 was released on August 20, 2026, and 24.0.1 on September 7, 2026.
- Maintained older lines: The 23.0 and 22.0 lines still received maintenance releases in 2026, which gives you time to plan an upgrade.
- Paid support: Ask partners and the association for current support terms and whether they cover your version and modules.
Confirm your upgrade path and the support you need from the association or a partner before you budget for ongoing maintenance.
Both platforms extend through add-ons, but the marketplace model and the cost of each extension differ. Dolibarr offers the DoliStore add-on marketplace and a low-code Module Builder for custom work. Pricing for individual add-ons is set by their publishers, so the budget depends on which modules you need and who maintains them.
- DoliStore marketplace: Dolibarr add-ons come from DoliStore, and each listing sets its own license and price. Check the terms for each module.
- Module Builder: The low-code Module Builder helps your team create custom modules. Staff time to build and maintain them is a recurring cost.
- ERPNext apps: Confirm which ERPNext apps you need, their license, who maintains them, and whether any carry a fee.
- Upgrade compatibility: Ask each add-on publisher which release lines it supports, including the Dolibarr 24.0.1 line and older lines still under maintenance.
- Custom code: Budget for testing and maintenance of any custom code after every major release.
Before you compare costs, list every add-on your process needs and ask each publisher for its license, price model and support window.
Self-hosting moves cost into infrastructure, staff time and implementation work, while managed hosting moves part of that cost into a service contract. ERPNext can be self-hosted with Docker through Frappe Docker or run on Frappe Cloud. Dolibarr runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, so your database choice and its licensing and support terms also affect the budget.
- Infrastructure: Compute, storage, backups and network costs in your cloud account or data center recur every month.
- Managed hosting: Frappe Cloud handles installation, upgrades, monitoring and support. Ask for its fee schedule and what it excludes.
- Database: Confirm the licensing and support terms for MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL in your environment.
- Implementation: DeployOpen plans, implements and documents self-hosted platforms, usually under a fixed scope agreed in writing. A quote follows from that written scope, and ongoing support is available as a retainer.
- Internal effort: Staff time for administration, upgrades and testing is often the largest recurring cost, so ask each option for its expected operating load.
Ask each vendor and partner for a written quote that separates one-time implementation from recurring hosting and support.
What drives the running cost of each platform
Running cost for ERPNext and Dolibarr comes from the same places: hosting, people who keep the system patched, customization skills, add-ons and upgrade testing. The split between who pays and what recurs differs between the two, so compare quotes on the same components before comparing totals.
Hosting and database infrastructure
Self-hosted ERPNext needs a stack that matches the Frappe Framework requirements, including MariaDB, Redis or Valkey, Python and Node.js, so the server footprint is usually larger than a PHP suite. Dolibarr runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which may let you reuse existing database hosting. Ask each vendor or partner to price compute, storage, backups and a staging copy as separate line items, and confirm which of these recur monthly.
Frappe Cloud or self-hosting labor
Frappe Cloud is the vendor's managed option and covers installation, upgrades, monitoring and support, so it converts much of the labor into a recurring subscription. Self-hosting through Frappe Docker moves that work to your team or a partner. Ask whether a quote includes patching, monitoring and on-call coverage, and whether those hours recur each year.
Python and PHP customization skills
ERPNext customization is written in Python and JavaScript, while Dolibarr extensions are PHP, and the Module Builder reduces some low-code work. Your cost depends on whether your in-house staff already know these languages or you must hire or contract them. Request a skills estimate for each planned change, and confirm who maintains custom code after go-live.
Add-on and module purchases
Dolibarr extensions can come from the DoliStore marketplace, where individual add-ons may carry their own license or fee terms. ERPNext is GPL-3.0, but any paid or third-party apps you adopt need their terms checked separately. Build a list of required modules, then ask for each license type, whether fees are one-time or annual, and whether renewals change the price.
Upgrade testing and release tracking
Both projects release often. ERPNext published v16.51.1 on October 15, 2026 and Dolibarr published 24.0.1 on September 7, 2026, so upgrades are a recurring activity, not a one-off. Budget time for regression testing of custom code and integrations on each release you adopt. Ask who runs the test environment and how long a major version upgrade typically takes in your scope.
Partner support and retainers
Partner support is usually the largest variable line in either platform. A fixed-scope implementation is a one-time cost, while a retainer for support, upgrades and continuous testing recurs. Ask what response windows are included, which upgrades are covered, and what is billed as extra work. Confirm that the written scope and deliverables match the quote before work starts.
Moving data from Dolibarr to ERPNext or the reverse
This sequence takes a team from an inventory of what it runs today to a verified cutover on the other platform, with each step producing a check the team can review before the next one starts. It keeps the move reversible until the final switch.
Inventory modules, data and integrations
Start by listing every Dolibarr module in use, every table of master data, each open transaction type, and every add-on, script or external system that reads from or writes to the database. Finance, sales, purchasing, stock and project owners should sign off their part of the list, because a module nobody named is the usual source of missing data later. The output is a written inventory with an owner and a retirement or migration decision for each line. Confirm the target platform's module coverage against this list before any data is exported, since ERPNext and Dolibarr differ in module depth and in how they handle manufacturing and services work.
Map master data and open transactions
Build a field-by-field mapping from the source schema to the target doctypes or tables for customers, suppliers, items, chart of accounts, tax codes, price lists and warehouses. Decide which open documents move as live records (such as unpaid invoices, open purchase orders and stock on hand) and which stay in the old system as read-only history. Agree the mapping with finance so that balances reconcile. The output is an approved mapping document with a reconciliation rule for each balance, and a short list of fields that have no direct equivalent and need a decision.
Rebuild custom fields, reports and add-ons
Recreate the custom fields, print layouts, reports and workflow rules the business depends on in the target platform. Dolibarr extensions from the DoliStore marketplace and modules built with the Module Builder generally need to be replaced by target-side configuration or custom code rather than copied across, so treat each one as a new build with its own test. Record which items were rebuilt natively, which were written as custom code and which were dropped. The output is a rebuild register that the business owners approve, and it is also the main input to any later exit plan.
Run test loads and reconcile balances
Load the mapped data into a non-production environment at least once, then repeat the load until the results are stable. Reconcile customer and supplier balances, ledger totals, stock valuation and open order quantities against the source system at a fixed extract date. Investigate every difference and record its cause. The output is a signed reconciliation pack showing that each balance matches or that each gap has an approved explanation, which is the evidence needed before a parallel run starts.
Operate a parallel run
Run both systems for a defined period, entering the same transactions in the source system and the target, or in the target only if the source is frozen for those flows. Compare outputs such as invoices, stock movements, payroll-related postings if relevant, and month-end reports each cycle. The period length should be set in writing by the project owner, since no duration is fixed by the platforms. The output is a parallel-run log with every variance logged, owned and closed, and a go or no-go decision recorded by the business owners.
Cut over and verify production
On the agreed cutover date, freeze the source system, run the final delta extract, load it into the target, and repeat the reconciliation from the test loads against the frozen data. Switch users, integrations and reporting to the target only after the check passes. Keep the source system in read-only form and retain a tested backup of it so the team can answer audit or dispute questions. The output is a cutover record listing the extract timestamp, reconciliation results, the user switch time and the owner who approved go-live.
Limit lock-in and keep the exit path open
After go-live, keep the mapping documents, the rebuild register and the reconciliation packs in the company's own repository, and export master data and transaction history in an open format on a schedule. Confirm with the vendor or the hosting provider which export options, database access and backup formats are available in the chosen deployment, since these vary with self-hosting versus managed hosting. The output is a documented exit kit that a future team could use to move data again without depending on the original implementer.
Where ERPNext and Dolibarr projects usually run long
Implementation effort on both platforms concentrates in the same places: data migration, custom workflows and integrations. On ERPNext, customization happens inside the Frappe model, so a team extending DocTypes, server scripts, workflows or print formats needs developers who understand the framework's conventions and its upgrade path. On Dolibarr, most early work is module configuration, followed by Module Builder work for anything the standard modules do not cover. In both cases, the timeline stretches when a custom requirement lands late and has to be rebuilt after the first upgrade. Before you sign a fixed scope, ask the implementer to list every custom DocType, module or script it expects to maintain, and who will own each one after go-live.
Data cleansing is the most common reason migrations slip. Customer, supplier, item and opening balance records usually arrive with duplicates, inconsistent units of measure and missing tax or account codes. Plan a cleansing pass with named owners for each master data set, and run at least two trial loads into a non-production instance before the cutover date. Client-side inputs that decide whether the project stays on time include finance and operations process owners who sign off decisions, a complete sample of real transactions for testing, and a written change control process that records which requests enter the current scope and which wait for a later release.
User training and change control are where smaller teams underestimate effort. Each role that approves purchase orders, posts journal entries or runs stock counts needs hands-on practice with its own data, not a generic walkthrough. Confirm with your implementer how many training sessions and test cycles are included in the written scope, and who prepares the user guides. For integrations with payroll, banking or an e-commerce store, agree on the test data, the API credentials and the environment where each connection is validated. Requirements that change after sign-off should go through the same written change request process, because unrecorded changes are the usual source of overruns on both platforms.
Questions buyers ask before choosing ERPNext or Dolibarr
What drives the cost of implementing ERPNext or Dolibarr?
Scope, data and integration work drive most of the cost. Both platforms are open source under GPL-3.0, so the software license itself costs nothing, and you pay for the people who plan, configure, migrate, integrate, harden and support the system. Cost rises with the number of modules in use, the volume and condition of legacy data, the number of systems that must connect to the ERP, custom reports or approval workflows, and the hosting model you choose. Some costs are one-time, such as design, data migration and training. Others recur, including hosting or a managed service, staff time for upgrades and monitoring, and any support retainer. Ask every implementation partner for a fixed-scope quote with deliverables listed by module, a migration approach, and a separate line for ongoing support. DeployOpen agrees scope, deliverables and timelines in writing before work starts and does not publish a price list, so the quote follows from that written scope.
How long does an ERPNext or Dolibarr project usually take?
No supplied figure gives a reliable duration for either platform, so treat any number from a vendor or partner as a claim to test against your own scope. Timelines depend on how many modules go live at the same time, how many workflows you must redesign, how clean your source data is, how many integrations exist, and how many approval rounds your stakeholders need. A narrower first phase, such as invoicing, quoting and project tracking in Dolibarr, can shorten the path to a first go-live, though the modules you need decide that. Ask for a written plan with phases, sign-off gates, a test cycle, a data migration rehearsal and a cutover window. Ask what the plan assumes about data quality and who is responsible if those assumptions fail. DeployOpen commits to timelines only in the agreed written scope.
Can an internal team run either platform without a partner?
A capable internal team can run either platform, but the answer depends on who owns hosting, patching, backups, upgrades, access reviews and security testing. Both are self-hosted open-source systems, so your team operates the servers, database and backup jobs unless you choose a managed service. ERPNext can be self-hosted with Docker through Frappe Docker or run on Frappe Cloud, which the vendor describes as handling installation, upgrades, monitoring and support. Dolibarr runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL and is extended through DoliStore and its Module Builder, so your team needs someone able to review third-party add-ons and custom modules before they reach production. Before you commit, confirm that you have named owners for upgrades, incident response and backup restore tests. A partner can cover specific gaps under a written scope rather than running the system for you.
Which platform needs more in-house technical skill to operate?
ERPNext usually asks for more in-house technical skill, because the Frappe stack combines Python, JavaScript, MariaDB, Redis or Valkey and Node.js. The Frappe Framework v16 installation documentation lists MariaDB 11.8, Redis or Valkey 6 or later, Python 3.14 and Node.js 24, so your team needs people comfortable with each layer and with keeping those versions aligned. Dolibarr is a modular PHP application on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which is a simpler operating profile for many IT teams. Its Module Builder is described as low-code, which lowers the bar for light customization, though complex changes still need a developer who understands the data model. Confirm the supported PHP version for the Dolibarr release you plan to run in its documentation, and confirm the database versions against your own hosting standards before choosing a platform.
How do upgrades differ between ERPNext and Dolibarr?
Both projects are actively released, so upgrade planning is an ongoing task on either platform. ERPNext v16.0.0 was released on January 12, 2026, and the v15 line still received v15.123.0 on October 14, 2026. Dolibarr 24.0.0 was released on August 20, 2026, and older lines such as 23.0 and 22.0 still received maintenance releases in 2026. Upgrade effort depends on how far you move between major versions, how much custom code you run, and whether your add-ons support the target release. Frappe v16 requires newer runtime components, so a major ERPNext upgrade may also include host changes. For Dolibarr, the add-ons installed from DoliStore and your custom modules usually drive most of the retesting. Keep a staging environment, take verified backups before each upgrade, and list every add-on that needs re-verification.
Which one suits a small services firm better?
For many small services firms, Dolibarr is the more proportionate starting point when the core need is quoting, invoicing, contracts, project tracking and basic accounting. You can enable only the modules you need on a PHP application that runs on MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL, which keeps the first deployment small. ERPNext fits a services firm that expects to bring inventory, purchasing, manufacturing-style workflows or more complex multi-entity accounting into the same system, and that can staff the heavier Frappe stack. Test each candidate against your actual billing model, time tracking, retainer handling and reporting before deciding. Illustrative example: a five-person consultancy that bills by the hour may need time capture and project invoicing, while a firm that resells equipment may need stock control from the start. Ask a partner to map your workflows to module coverage in writing.
Which add-ons and extensions should I check before choosing?
Check the extensions against the workflows you cannot replace, because add-ons decide much of your long-term effort. Dolibarr is extended through the DoliStore add-on marketplace and its low-code Module Builder. ERPNext runs on the Frappe Framework, which is MIT-licensed, and the ERPNext codebase itself is GPL-3.0. Each third-party add-on carries its own license and maintenance history, so verify those terms before you depend on one. For every add-on on your shortlist, ask who maintains it, which release lines it supports, whether it has been tested against the version you plan to run, and what happens to it during upgrades. Record these answers in your requirements document. An add-on that saves time today can become the main blocker at your next upgrade if nobody owns it.
How DeployOpen helps choose and implement either platform
DeployOpen is a Chainscore Labs company that plans, implements, customizes, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades, documents and supports self-hosted open-source platforms inside your own infrastructure. We apply the same method whether the shortlist leads to ERPNext on the Frappe Framework or to Dolibarr, starting with the requirements that separate the two.
How we scope
- Map which modules your manufacturing, services or association workflows need before comparing either platform on depth.
- Agree the hosting target, whether your cloud account, data center or air-gapped network, in writing before work starts.
- Record the written scope, deliverables and timelines for ERPNext or Dolibarr so both sides know what is included.
How we build
- Install and configure the chosen platform on the stack it requires, such as MariaDB, Redis or Valkey for ERPNext, or MySQL, MariaDB or PostgreSQL for Dolibarr.
- Decide which add-ons, custom modules or integrations are built in-house and which come from existing marketplaces, and document each choice.
- Run security testing on applications, APIs and infrastructure before go-live, and keep the findings tied to the agreed scope.
How we hand over
- Deliver configuration records, runbooks and backup and upgrade procedures so your own team can operate the platform after handover.
- Walk your administrators through module setup, user roles and identity integration against the documented design.
- Prepare system descriptions and control evidence for compliance readiness, noting that independent auditors issue any formal assessment.
How we support
- Offer ongoing support, upgrades and continuous testing as a retainer after the fixed-scope implementation closes.
- Plan upgrades against the release cadence of your chosen line, such as ERPNext v16 or the Dolibarr 24.0 series, and confirm each target before changes.
- Ask your vendor and our team to confirm current maintenance windows for your selected version before committing to a support model.
