Comparisons anchored on SOC 2, the AICPA attestation report on a service organization's controls: against HIPAA, PCI DSS, the GDPR, SOX, the NIST CSF, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 42001, the CIS Controls, NIS2 and DORA.
For health tech vendors and business associates: HIPAA is a legal duty enforced by HHS OCR with no certificate, while SOC 2 is a voluntary CPA attestation that customers ask for. Covers what a SOC 2 report can and cannot show about HIPAA, SOC 2+ reports, the risk analysis and business associate duties no report replaces, and which to fund first.
For SaaS companies and payment service providers asked for both: PCI DSS is a payment brand obligation validated by a QSA report on compliance or a self-assessment questionnaire, SOC 2 a CPA report on chosen trust services criteria. Explains why a QSA cannot rely on a SOC 2 report but can reuse its evidence, the testing cadences PCI DSS fixes, and how to sequence the two audits.
For companies selling to both US and EU customers: the GDPR is binding law with fines and no mandatory audit, while SOC 2 is an attestation a buyer requests. Covers what privacy criteria in a SOC 2 do and do not prove, how GDPR Article 42 certification differs, what processors must show controllers under Article 28, and where to start.
A third-party attestation report versus a voluntary outcome framework with no certificate: when a customer's security review needs a SOC 2, when a NIST CSF 2.0 profile is enough to show maturity, what each costs, and whether running both makes sense for a growing service company.
Two different questions: SOX Section 404 is a public company's own assessment of internal control over financial reporting, including IT general controls, while SOC 2 reports on a service organization's security controls. Explains where SOC 1 fits for vendors whose systems feed customers' financial reporting, who must meet 404(a) and 404(b), and when a company needs both.
For AI product companies facing AI governance questions from customers: a SOC 2 attests to security controls as of a date or over a period, while ISO/IEC 42001 certifies an AI management system with AI impact assessment and 38 Annex A controls. Covers certificate versus report, audit cycles and costs, the status of 42001 certification bodies, and how the two can run side by side.
For SaaS, managed service and cloud providers serving EU customers: NIS2 is national law with registration, staged incident reporting and fines if you are in scope, while a SOC 2 report is evidence you hand to customers. Covers how NIS2 reaches suppliers through Article 21(2)(d), what authorities can ask in-scope providers to show, and the NIS2 duties no audit report covers.
For ICT providers selling to EU banks, insurers and payment firms: DORA puts contract clauses, audit rights and TLPT participation on providers through their financial customers, while a SOC 2 is one form of assurance those customers may accept. Covers what Article 30 contracts demand, where independent audit reports fit in the customer's ICT third-party policy, and what a SOC 2 leaves open.
An audit report versus a prioritized safeguard list with no certificate for your own organization: whether to adopt CIS Controls Implementation Group 1 as the control baseline before a SOC 2, how CIS's own v8.1 mapping links safeguards to SOC 2 criteria, and what each costs to assess.
Commercial customers versus US federal buyers: a SOC 2 Type 2 against the trust services criteria, or NIST SP 800-53 baselines assessed under SP 800-53A, for cloud services through FedRAMP. Covers the AICPA's published TSC to 800-53 mapping, FedRAMP Class A for products that already hold a SOC 2 Type II, baseline sizes and assessment effort.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.