Comparisons anchored on ASD's Essential Eight mitigation strategies and maturity model: against ISO 27001, the NIST CSF, the CIS Controls and SOC 2.
For Australian organizations and suppliers to Australian government: the Essential Eight is a prescriptive technical baseline with maturity levels and no certificate, while ISO/IEC 27001 certifies a risk-based ISMS. Covers what each assesses, the jump from Maturity Level One to Two, eight strategies against 93 Annex A controls chosen by risk, and which to do first.
Eight specific mitigation strategies versus a broad outcome framework: covers Essential Eight maturity levels against CSF tiers and profiles, ASD's Essentials series and its evidence mapping to CSF 2.0, what ASD says that mapping does not mean, and how organizations in and outside Australia combine the two.
Two prioritized technical baselines: ASD's eight strategies with Maturity Levels One to Three against CIS's 18 Controls and three Implementation Groups. Compares Maturity Level One with Implementation Group 1, patching and asset discovery expectations, free assessment tools and machine-readable profiles, and which suits an organization outside Australia or a supplier to Australian government.
For Australian SaaS and IT providers deciding what assurance to offer customers at home and abroad: an Essential Eight maturity level, assessed against ASD's model with no certificate, versus a SOC 2 report from a CPA firm over a period. Compares what each covers and proves, recurring work, cost and timing, and which to pursue first.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.