Comparisons anchored on Kong Gateway, the NGINX-based API gateway whose Apache-2.0 open source line stays on 3.9 while newer releases ship as Kong Gateway Enterprise: against Tyk.
Which self-managed Kong Gateway topology to run: traditional mode with every node on a shared database, DB-less mode with declarative configuration in memory, or hybrid mode with control plane nodes on the database and data planes without one. Covers resilience, security exposure, plugins that need a database, CI/CD fit and the hosted Konnect control plane.
A gateway-first open-source edition against a full API management platform: Kong Gateway on the open-source 3.9 line with DB-less and hybrid modes, against Gravitee APIM's Apache-2.0 gateway, management console and developer portal. Covers what each open-source edition includes, event and Kafka endpoints in Gravitee's Enterprise Edition, plugin models and support windows.
Kong Gateway's open-source edition against WSO2 API Manager's Apache-2.0 control plane, gateway, traffic manager, publisher and developer portal. Covers when a lightweight gateway is enough and when teams need full lifecycle API management, the support gap on Kong's open-source 3.9 line, WSO2's commercial subscriptions, and WSO2's ability to manage Kong gateways from one control plane.
Two open-core API gateways compared: what stays in Kong's Apache-2.0 3.9 line versus Kong Gateway Enterprise, and what Tyk's MPL-2.0 gateway includes versus its licensed Dashboard, Portal and Operator, plus deployment and plugins.
What the Apache-2.0 Kong Gateway still offers on its 3.9 line against Kong Gateway Enterprise: release lines and support windows, Enterprise-tier plugins such as OpenID Connect, the removal of unlicensed free mode in 3.10, and what that means for self-hosted teams.
Kong Gateway against Envoy Gateway for Kubernetes API traffic: plugin ecosystem in Lua, Go and JavaScript against Gateway API resources with Wasm and Lua extensions, and OIDC, an Enterprise-tier plugin in Kong but documented in Envoy Gateway.
API gateway against cloud-native reverse proxy: Kong's plugins, authentication options and Admin API against Traefik's automatic route discovery and Let's Encrypt support, compared for ingress, API security, licensing and the commercial tiers each vendor sells.
Kong Gateway against KrakenD CE: database, DB-less and hybrid topologies against KrakenD's stateless nodes with declarative configuration, compared on aggregation, plugin model, licensing of the open-source lines and enterprise editions.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.