Running SOC 2 as a recurring program: the Type 2 observation period, moving from Type 1, the annual cycle, monitoring between audits, changing auditors, adding categories, and handling acquisitions, platform changes and incidents in the report.
How long the first and later Type 2 periods should be: no generally accepted minimum, management chooses the period, what customers and auditors expect, how large providers run 12-month periods, and why very short windows invite scrutiny.
How to go from a Type 1 to the first Type 2: what changes in the report and the testing, starting the period, keeping controls operating and evidenced throughout, and the cost difference in published estimates.
How to run SOC 2 year after year: back-to-back periods with no gaps, bridge letters, updating the system description for changes, the recurring cost, and what peer reviewers expect when this year's report is compared with last year's.
How to keep SOC 2 controls operating between audits: ongoing and separate evaluations under CC4.1, tracking deficiencies to closure, configuration and policy scanning that produce evidence continuously, and what monitoring dashboards cannot replace.
When to change the CPA firm behind your SOC 2 and how to do it without a coverage gap: warning signs in the current firm, license and peer review checks on the new one, timing against the report period, and what to ask before signing.
How to add availability, confidentiality, processing integrity or privacy to a security-only SOC 2: what each category adds, the extra points of focus privacy brings to the common criteria, the effect on effort and how to phase it in.
How significant changes affect a SOC 2: disclosing changes during the period in the system description, assessing changes under CC3.4, bringing an acquired company or new product into scope, and moving infrastructure mid-period.
What happens to a SOC 2 when an incident occurs during the period: disclosure of significant system incidents under DC 200, how incident response and recovery controls are evaluated, management's representations and the effect on the opinion.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.