Which fits your estate: Red Hat Virtualization or Proxmox VE
Red Hat Virtualization fits best when the estate depends on a Red Hat support contract, when the operations team already runs Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its management tooling, and when the organization wants the engine vendor to answer for the platform in production. Proxmox VE fits when the goal is one open-source platform that combines KVM virtual machines, LXC containers, clustering, high availability and software-defined storage in a single web interface, when the team is willing to run its own storage design, and when the subscription choice can be limited to support on each physical CPU socket or skipped entirely. Note that the Extended Life Phase of Red Hat Virtualization 4.4 ends on August 31, 2026, so the decision has a fixed deadline that the migration plan must work back from.
The decision turns on four things. The first is support expectations: Proxmox VE software is the same across all subscription tiers, and the tiers differ in ticket volume and response time, so confirm what your operations and incident model actually requires before choosing a tier or relying on the community repository. The second is storage design. An RHV estate built on storage domains must be mapped to Proxmox VE local storage on LVM or ZFS, or to shared network storage such as NFS, iSCSI or Ceph RBD. High availability needs shared storage for guests and at least three cluster nodes, so a clustered design with Ceph requires its own capacity, network and hardware planning. The third is operating skills, including Linux administration, Ceph or ZFS expertise and the scripting that replaces RHV automation. The fourth is migration sequencing, which should move one cluster at a time, starting with a pilot set of non-critical VMs.
Before committing, ask the RHV administrator to export a complete inventory of storage domains, VM disk sizes, network mappings and guest operating systems, and check which guests need driver or guest agent changes after conversion. Then run a timed test import of one representative VM on non-production hardware. The results will show whether the support model, the storage design and the team's skills fit together, and they give a defensible basis for the plan that must finish before the Extended Life Phase ends.
Which platform fits each scenario
This table maps common Red Hat Virtualization exit scenarios to the platform that usually fits best, with the condition that makes each advantage matter. Read each row against your own cluster size, skills, storage design and support requirements, because the right answer changes when any one of those conditions changes.
| Scenario | Better fit | Why and when it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Small cluster with in-house Linux skills | Proxmox VE | One web interface covers KVM VMs, LXC containers, clustering and storage. It matters when a small team can operate Debian-based hosts itself and does not need a separate engine VM to manage the estate. |
| Large estate that needs vendor-backed support | Proxmox VE with a higher subscription tier, or oVirt with a named vendor | Proxmox subscriptions are per CPU socket per year and add ticket-based support, with response times that rise by tier. Confirm the support model and escalation path with the vendor before committing, because community support does not replace a contract. |
| Team that wants Ceph under the hypervisor | Proxmox VE with Ceph | Proxmox integrates Ceph RBD and CephFS with its own tooling, so hyperconverged storage sits in the same management layer. Plan OSD layout, network bonding and memory for peak use, since Ceph sizing decides performance more than the hypervisor does. |
| Team that wants one platform for VMs and containers | Harvester or OpenShift Virtualization | Harvester runs VMs on KubeVirt inside Kubernetes, which suits teams already standardizing on Kubernetes. Proxmox VE runs LXC containers beside VMs but does not run Kubernetes workloads natively, so choose it only if containers are lightweight Linux services. |
| Regulated environment needing a named support contract | Proxmox VE Standard or Premium, or a vendor-backed oVirt distribution | Regulators and auditors usually want a named party responsible for patches and incidents. Ask Proxmox which tier includes the response time your policy requires, and confirm that your change process can use the Enterprise repository. |
| Tight timeline before the Extended Life Phase ends | Proxmox VE with the import wizard for VMware-style sources, or qm disk import for RHV exports | Proxmox documents its import paths and their limits, so a pilot on a few non-critical VMs shows how guest drivers and networking behave. Start the pilot early, because RHV storage domain exports and guest driver changes often take longer than the copy itself. |
How Proxmox VE clustering and high availability compare with RHV clusters
Proxmox VE clusters use a multi-master design in which every node can perform all management tasks, and the Proxmox Cluster File System replicates configuration to all nodes in real time. That changes the failure model compared with RHV, where the Manager (engine) is a central control point that hosts report to. In Proxmox VE, there is no separate management appliance to protect, so the question for your team is how each node's configuration and quorum behave when nodes drop out, not whether a single engine host is available. Review the cluster design with that difference in mind before you map RHV clusters one to one onto Proxmox clusters.
High availability in Proxmox VE has firmer prerequisites than many RHV administrators expect. The Proxmox VE High Availability documentation calls for at least three cluster nodes for reliable quorum, shared storage that guests can reach from any node, redundant hardware, and watchdog-based fencing, so that a failed node is reset before its guests restart elsewhere. A two-node cluster with a quorum device is not a substitute for the three-node baseline. Confirm how your hardware exposes watchdog devices, how fencing is verified, and whether power and network paths to every node are redundant, because a fencing failure is the most common reason a failover does not happen as planned.
RHV leans on the engine and host fencing through power management agents, and it places the management plane under Red Hat's support model. Proxmox VE moves those responsibilities onto the cluster itself, which makes quorum and watchdog behavior the first things to test. In your own environment, run failover tests that power off a node without a clean shutdown, pull its network links, and partition the cluster, then record how long guests take to recover and whether any guest starts twice. Ask your hardware and storage vendors to confirm watchdog support and fencing behavior on your exact platform, and treat that test evidence as the basis for your cutover plan.
Capability comparison from supplied facts
This table sets Red Hat Virtualization against Proxmox VE across the areas that drive a platform decision: hypervisor, management, clustering, storage, licensing, support and migration. Where a Red Hat Virtualization cell depends on details we have not verified, it tells you what to confirm with Red Hat. Read it as a checklist for your own requirements, then test the open items in a pilot cluster.
| Capability | Red Hat Virtualization | Proxmox VE |
|---|---|---|
| Hypervisor base | KVM hosts managed by the RHV engine | KVM virtual machines plus LXC containers in one platform |
| Management interface and APIs | Engine web administration portal; confirm the current REST API version and automation tooling with Red Hat | Web interface on every node, plus a documented API and the qm command line for VM tasks |
| Clustering model | Central engine manages hosts and data centers; confirm engine redundancy options with Red Hat | Multi-master cluster where every node can perform all management tasks, with configuration replicated in real time |
| High availability | Confirm HA behavior, fencing and quorum requirements with Red Hat | Needs at least three nodes for reliable quorum, shared storage, redundant hardware and watchdog-based fencing |
| Local storage options | Storage domains; confirm supported local and block back ends with Red Hat | LVM, directories and ZFS |
| Network storage options | Storage domains; confirm supported protocols and Ceph support with Red Hat | iSCSI, NFS, CIFS, Ceph RBD, CephFS and Proxmox Backup Server |
| Containers | Not part of the RHV scope; confirm with Red Hat if containers are needed | LXC containers managed alongside KVM virtual machines |
| Licensing model | Subscription from Red Hat; confirm current terms and entitlements with Red Hat | Software is free and open source under AGPL v3; paid subscriptions are per CPU socket per year |
| Support model | Red Hat subscription support; Extended Life Phase ends August 31, 2026 | Optional subscription tiers with ticket and response entitlements; same features in every tier |
| Migration tooling | Export VMs or disks from storage domains; confirm supported export paths with Red Hat | Import wizard for VMware, qm importovf, qm disk import for VMDK files and Clonezilla as alternatives |
Ceph or ZFS: what replaces RHV storage domains
RHV storage domains map to a small set of Proxmox VE storage types, each suited to different hardware and operating skills. Local ZFS and shared network storage cover most estates, while Ceph is a separate platform to size and run. The cards below set out when each option fits and what to check before choosing.
Local ZFS storage
ZFS on each node is the simplest fit when VMs can tolerate a node loss or when replication and backups cover recovery. Proxmox VE uses it for local guest disks, so there is no separate storage array to operate. The trade-off is that live migration and high availability need shared storage, so check whether your RHV workloads depend on live migration between hosts before you standardize on local disks. Confirm the RAM and disk layout each host needs for ZFS with your hardware vendor.
LVM and directory storage
LVM volumes and directory storage cover hosts with existing hardware RAID or simpler local disks. Directories are useful for ISO images, templates and backups, while LVM gives block volumes for VM disks. Neither provides shared storage by itself, so plan the cluster design around it. Map each RHV storage domain to a Proxmox storage ID and confirm which content types each one carries before the move.
NFS, iSCSI and CIFS
Network storage from an existing array is the closest match to an RHV storage domain, since Proxmox VE can attach NFS, iSCSI and CIFS shares to every node in a cluster. This keeps shared storage for live migration and high availability without a Ceph build. Confirm that your array vendor supports the protocol version and multipath setup you need, and test failover of a node with the array attached before cutover.
Ceph RBD and CephFS
Ceph is open source under LGPL-2.1 or LGPL-3, and the project sells no paid edition, so cost sits in hardware, staff time and any support contract you buy from a third party. The actively maintained lines are Tentacle, first released November 18, 2025, with an estimated end of life of June 1, 2027, and Squid, with an estimated end of life of October 31, 2026. Follow the hardware recommendations: a dedicated drive per OSD, WAL and DB on shared SSDs for HDD-based OSDs, bonded links across two switches, memory sized for peak use, and benchmarks before purchase. Ceph is its own skill set, so budget for training or an operator who can run it day to day.
Proxmox Backup Server
Proxmox Backup Server is the backup target that Proxmox VE supports natively, and it is a separate product from the hypervisor cluster. Use it as the backup target for VMs whose disks sit on ZFS, LVM, NFS or Ceph. Place it on separate hardware and storage from the production cluster so a storage failure does not remove both the VMs and their backups. Ask your team which restore tests will run each month and who signs off on them.
Data control and hosting models for each platform
In a data center you own, Proxmox VE runs on your hosts, so VM disks sit on the storage you attach, whether that is local LVM or ZFS, or network storage such as NFS, iSCSI or Ceph RBD. The cluster configuration is stored on every node through the Proxmox Cluster File System, which means the configuration never leaves your hardware. Backups usually go to Proxmox Backup Server or another target you operate. Your team holds all keys, including disk encryption keys, the root password and the Ceph cluster keys if Ceph is in use.
- Disk and config location: VM disks and
/etc/pveconfiguration remain on hardware you control, with no vendor-hosted control plane. - Identity: Proxmox VE user management supports its own realms and external realms such as LDAP, Active Directory and OpenID Connect, so you can tie administrator access to your directory.
- Key custody: Your staff manage the root account, API tokens and any encryption keys for backup targets.
- Subscription and repositories: A subscription key unlocks the enterprise repository, which is what you would use for production patches. Confirm the repository in use on each node during audits.
- Evidence you collect: Access logs, patch records, backup restore tests and the cluster network diagram all come from your own systems.
Confirm with your auditor which of these controls they expect to see evidenced from your own tooling.
On an air-gapped network Proxmox VE has no route to the internet, so the team must plan how packages, updates and subscription checks reach the hosts. Proxmox VE is free software under the AGPL v3, so you can install it from media you have verified and mirror the repositories inside the enclave. The enterprise repository still requires a valid subscription key, so an air-gapped site must plan for how that key is used. Identity usually depends on an internal directory, and all keys and backups stay inside the isolated network.
- Update path: Build an internal mirror of the Proxmox repositories and move signed packages across through your approved transfer process.
- Subscription handling: Confirm with Proxmox how an offline subscription key is validated and how often it must be checked.
- Identity: Use an internal LDAP or Active Directory realm, and document what happens to administrator access if the directory is unreachable.
- Backup isolation: Keep Proxmox Backup Server and any offsite copies inside the enclave, and test restores from media you can verify.
- Evidence you collect: Transfer logs, media hashes, change tickets and the record of who imported each package.
Write down the transfer procedure before go-live, because auditors will ask how every update reached the isolated hosts.
When Proxmox VE runs on virtual machines or bare-metal servers in the client's own cloud account, the cloud provider operates the physical facilities and hypervisor below you, while your team still controls the Proxmox nodes, storage and backups. Disks sit on cloud block storage or on volumes you attach to the nodes, and the cloud account's key management service often wraps those volumes. Nested virtualization support and network design depend on the provider, so confirm those points before committing. Identity can use your cloud directory through an external realm, but the Proxmox administrative accounts remain your responsibility.
- Disk and backup location: VM disks sit on provider-managed volumes in the regions you choose, and backups belong in a separate account or region you control.
- Key custody: Decide whether the cloud key service or your own keys wrap volumes, and record who can revoke them.
- Identity: Connect Proxmox VE to your directory through an external realm and remove local accounts where policy allows.
- Shared responsibility: The provider documents the controls it runs; you document the Proxmox layer, hardening and access reviews.
- Evidence you collect: Account configuration exports, key policy records, region settings and the provider's own compliance reports that cover the services you use.
DeployOpen prepares systems, controls and evidence for assessments, but it does not issue audit reports. Independent auditors and certification bodies do.
What a Proxmox VE subscription covers per socket
Proxmox VE is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3, and the software can be used without a subscription. The subscription is what you buy for support entitlements and access to the enterprise repository, which requires a valid subscription key. Subscriptions are priced per occupied CPU socket per year, so the count that matters is physical sockets in each host, not cores or virtual machines. The annual tiers are Community at 120 euros, Basic at 370 euros, Standard at 550 euros and Premium at 1,100 euros, according to the Proxmox VE pricing page. Confirm the current figures on that page before you model costs, since they can change.
The tiers differ in support, not features. Community includes no support tickets, Basic includes 3 tickets with a 1 business day response, Standard includes 10 tickets with a 4-hour response, and Premium includes unlimited tickets with a 2-hour response. All tiers include the same software features. The free no-subscription repository is intended for testing and non-production use, while the enterprise repository is the recommended choice for production. Production teams usually buy a tier so that every node receives tested, enterprise-channel package updates and so they have a vendor path for support tickets when a cluster misbehaves.
Ask Red Hat for your current RHV or OpenShift Virtualization subscription terms, including what support levels, socket or core counts and renewal dates apply to your estate, and whether the Extended Life Phase has any remaining entitlements you plan to rely on. Then compare those terms with a per-socket Proxmox VE quote for the same hosts, and note that the Proxmox figures cover support and repository access only, not your engineering time for migration or operations. Also decide whether your team will rely on the Community tier for non-production clusters and which tier applies to each production cluster.
Cost components on each side of the switch
Moving off Red Hat Virtualization changes who gets paid and for what. The costs split into software and support, hardware and storage, people, and a one-time migration effort, and each one moves differently. Ask every vendor and partner for these components separately so the comparison is like for like.
Software and subscription fees
Proxmox VE itself is free and open-source under AGPL v3, and the software can be used without a subscription. The recurring line is an optional Proxmox subscription priced per occupied CPU socket per year, with published tiers of 120, 370, 550 and 1,100 euros, as listed on the Proxmox VE pricing page. All tiers carry the same features, so the decision is about support entitlements and enterprise repository access. Count sockets per host across the whole cluster, and confirm with Proxmox whether any terms or tax apply in your region.
Hardware and storage
This is usually the largest one-time cost. Ceph, the common shared storage choice, expects a dedicated drive per OSD, enterprise-class SSDs for metadata, and bonded network links across two switches. Ceph's hardware guidance says to size memory for peak use and to benchmark before buying. ZFS or LVM local storage can lower the initial outlay but limits shared storage and high availability. Ask for a bill of materials that separates compute, network and storage.
Staff time to operate the cluster
This is the recurring cost most often underestimated. Proxmox VE is managed through one web interface and API, but a production cluster still needs people who can run Ceph, watchdog-based fencing, quorum and backups. Who carries that work, in-house staff or a retained partner, changes the budget line. Ask for the expected monthly operating hours, the on-call model and which skills are required for upgrades, which arrive on a regular Debian-based cycle.
Support contracts
Red Hat support covers RHV until its lifecycle ends, after which that line item stops. Proxmox support is part of the socket subscription, while a community-supported oVirt or OpenStack deployment has no vendor contract by default. Third-party support and retainers are priced separately. Check what is included, response times, the number of support tickets allowed, and whether the agreement covers upgrade assistance, since Proxmox tiers differ on this point.
Migration labor
This is a one-time cost that covers planning, exporting VMs or disks from RHV storage domains, importing them with qm importovf or qm disk import, testing guest drivers and networking, and keeping a rollback path. Costs rise with VM count, custom storage layouts, and the number of clusters moved in sequence. Ask for each phase as a separate line item with defined exit criteria, and for a rollback plan that states how RHV stays available until each cluster is verified.
Training for the new platform
Training is a one-time cost for administrators and the help desk, and it recurs when staff turn over. Proxmox VE, Ceph and the migration tooling each need hands-on practice, and the training should happen in a non-production environment before cutover. Ask whether the quote includes documentation, runbooks, knowledge transfer sessions and a test lab, and whether vendor courses or certifications are priced in or charged separately.
How a move from RHV storage domains to Proxmox VE runs
This sequence takes an RHV estate from inventory to a cluster-by-cluster cutover on Proxmox VE, with a pilot, a tested import path and a rollback plan at each stage. The detailed procedure for each step sits on the separate migration page.
Inventory VMs and storage domains
List every VM, its disks, its storage domain, its network profiles and its guest operating system, and record which VMs run on which RHV cluster. Mark VMs with snapshots, VMs with disks that depend on any storage type outside the plan, and VMs whose owners must approve a change window. Confirm with each application owner which VMs can be stopped, which need a warm path, and which must not move yet. The output is a signed-off inventory that maps every VM to a target cluster, storage pool and cutover wave.
Build a pilot Proxmox VE cluster
Your infrastructure team installs a small Proxmox VE cluster on hardware that matches the production hosts closely enough to test performance, and chooses the storage design before any VM moves. Decide between local storage on LVM or ZFS, network storage on NFS or iSCSI, or Ceph RBD, and confirm that the chosen design meets your high availability and backup requirements. Proxmox VE high availability needs at least three cluster nodes, shared storage for guests and watchdog-based fencing, so confirm each of these in your own environment. The pilot is done when nodes join the cluster, storage is visible on every node and a test VM runs on each node.
Export VMs or disks from RHV storage domains
Your storage and virtualization administrators export the selected VMs or their disks from the RHV storage domains in a format Proxmox VE can read, usually OVF with associated disk images. Work from a copy or a verified backup so the source stays intact for rollback. Confirm how your RHV version exports disks and where the export domain or staging area lives, because this depends on your own RHV configuration. The step closes when each exported VM has a complete set of disk files with checksums recorded and a test copy has been restored to the pilot cluster.
Import with qm importovf or qm disk import
On a pilot Proxmox VE node, the administrator imports each exported VM with the qm importovf command or imports disk images with qm disk import, then attaches them to a VM configuration. Record the VM settings the import changes, such as disk controller types, boot order, CPU model and network device types, and compare them with the RHV original. Confirm each import path against the exact disk format your exports produce, since the Proxmox documentation lists these as alternative import paths. The step is complete when the VM boots on Proxmox VE and its disks mount without errors.
Adjust guest agents, drivers and networking
Remove RHV-specific guest tools and install the QEMU guest agent and the VirtIO drivers that Proxmox VE expects, then rebuild network configuration for the Proxmox bridges and VLANs. Update IP settings, DNS entries and firewall rules that referenced the old hosts, and confirm that backup agents and monitoring still reach each guest. Test each operating system family separately, because driver and agent steps differ by Windows and Linux version. The step closes when every test VM reports its address and metrics to the guest agent, and network reachability matches the approved design.
Test failover and backups
Run planned node restarts, simulated host failures and restores from Proxmox Backup Server or your chosen backup target on the pilot cluster. Verify that high availability restarts guests on surviving nodes, that fencing behaves as designed, and that restored VMs boot with data intact. Confirm recovery time and recovery point objectives with your business owners, because the pilot must prove them rather than assume them. The step is done when a written test report records each scenario, its result and the actions needed before production.
Sequence the cutover cluster by cluster with rollback
Move production VMs in approved waves, one RHV cluster at a time, starting with the least critical workloads and ending with those that need the longest change windows. Before each wave, keep the RHV source VMs and their storage intact, and document the exact steps to power them back on and restore DNS or load balancer entries. Confirm rollback criteria with each application owner, such as failed boot, failed application checks or data mismatch, and name who can call a rollback. The sequence is complete when each wave has a signed acceptance record and the RHV source is retired only after the agreed retention period passes.
Questions buyers ask before switching from RHV to Proxmox VE
How much does it cost to switch from RHV to Proxmox VE?
The software itself is free, so the cost is driven by subscriptions, hardware, storage, and the labor to migrate and operate the new platform. Proxmox VE subscriptions are priced per occupied physical CPU socket per year, with Community at 120 euros, Basic at 370 euros, Standard at 550 euros and Premium at 1,100 euros, according to the Proxmox VE pricing page. Subscriptions are optional, and every tier has the same features. Ask any quote to separate one-time costs (planning, migration, testing, training) from recurring ones (subscriptions, support retainers, hardware refresh, and Ceph maintenance), and to show the socket count it assumes.
How long does an RHV to Proxmox VE migration take?
The duration depends on the number of VMs, total storage size, how many VMs carry snapshots, and how much downtime each service can tolerate. Proxmox documents that VMs with snapshots import more slowly, and that the import path differs by source (ESXi, OVF, or VMDK disks), which matters for RHV exports. Cold moves need a maintenance window per VM, while warm approaches reduce downtime but add sync and cutover work. Ask for a plan that sizes each wave by storage volume and downtime class, and confirm the pace with a pilot on a representative VM before committing to a schedule.
What does the client's team need to provide?
The client's team needs an inventory of VMs, their dependencies, network and VLAN layouts, storage domains, and owners who can approve cutover windows. Engineers must also be available to rebuild or validate guest drivers and guest agents, since those change when moving off RHV. Plan for a named test owner per application and someone who can sign off on rollback criteria. Ask the implementation partner to list these inputs in the written scope so the team knows its hours before work starts.
Can our own team migrate from RHV to Proxmox VE without outside help?
Many teams with Linux and virtualization experience can run a pilot themselves using Proxmox's documented import paths and the Migrate to Proxmox VE guide. The harder parts are storage design, Ceph sizing, high availability fencing and cutover sequencing across clusters, which benefit from experience. Proxmox recommends the enterprise repository for production, so decide early how updates will be sourced. A useful test is whether the team can restore a VM from backup and fail a node in a lab before production work begins.
Does Proxmox VE replace the Red Hat support contract?
Proxmox VE does not come with Red Hat's support, but Proxmox offers its own subscription tiers that include support tickets with response times, with Basic at 1 business day, Standard at 4 hours and Premium at 2 hours, according to the Proxmox VE pricing page. Those tiers are different products from Red Hat's, so compare coverage, escalation paths and the scope of what is supported. Ask both vendors and any implementation partner to state in writing which components they support and who is responsible for each layer.
How does Ceph change day-to-day operating effort?
Ceph adds a distributed storage layer, so the team takes on OSD health, monitor quorum, capacity planning and network design alongside the hypervisor. Ceph's hardware recommendations advise a dedicated drive per OSD, enterprise-class SSDs for metadata, and bonded network links across two switches, and they say to size memory for peak use. Cephadm manages the cluster as containers, which simplifies day-two tasks but still requires monitoring and upgrade planning. Ask for an operations runbook that covers failed drive replacement, rebalancing and upgrades before choosing Ceph over ZFS or external storage.
Does the Proxmox VE 8 end-of-life date affect new deployments?
New deployments should target a currently supported release, not Proxmox VE 8. The Proxmox FAQ states that a Proxmox VE version is supported at least as long as its matching Debian release has security support, roughly three years, and that Proxmox VE 8 on Debian 12 reached end of life in August 2026. Proxmox VE 9.2 was released on May 21, 2026, based on Debian 13. Confirm the current release and its support window in the Proxmox VE FAQ before fixing a version, and plan upgrade windows for the platform after go-live.
How DeployOpen works on this
DeployOpen plans and implements self-hosted open-source platforms inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped networks. For a Red Hat Virtualization to Proxmox VE decision, we start with a written scope that tests the comparison against your actual clusters, storage domains and VM inventory before any migration work begins.
How we scope
- Inventory RHV clusters, storage domains, hosts and VMs to size the Proxmox VE target and its node count.
- Map each VM's guest drivers, agents, networks and storage needs to a Proxmox VE import or export path.
- Agree the scope, deliverables and timeline in writing before work starts, since engagements are fixed-scope.
How we build
- Build a Proxmox VE test cluster, with shared storage design choices for Ceph or NFS documented and reviewed.
- Configure high availability, watchdog fencing, backup targets and Proxmox Backup Server against your recovery requirements.
- Test a pilot set of RHV VMs through export, import and guest driver changes, recording downtime and rollback steps.
How we hand over
- Deliver runbooks for cluster operations, storage, networking, backups and the cluster-by-cluster migration sequence.
- Document the subscription tier decision per socket, the repository choice and the patching process your team will own.
- Train your operators on the Proxmox VE web interface, API and cluster recovery procedures used in your environment.
How we support
- Offer ongoing support, upgrades and continuous testing as a retainer after handover.
- Plan Proxmox VE upgrades against the Debian release cycle and the Proxmox VE lifecycle for your estate.
- Prepare systems, controls and evidence for compliance assessments; independent auditors issue any attestation.
