ThreatQ, the threat intelligence platform from ThreatQuotient, now part of Securonix, deployed on premises or as SaaS. Pages here cover replacing it with self-hosted OpenCTI or MISP.
Comparing ThreatQ with self-hosted OpenCTI: the Threat Library and dynamic scoring against OpenCTI's STIX 2 knowledge graph and scoring, connectors and integrations, investigations against OpenCTI case management, deployment and who operates each.
ThreatQ against MISP for teams that mostly aggregate feeds and push indicators to SIEM and EDR tools: feed aggregation, scoring and decay, exports to detection tools, community sharing and the infrastructure each needs.
Moving from ThreatQ to OpenCTI: exporting indicators, adversaries and related objects, mapping ThreatQ's data model and scores to STIX 2 objects and OpenCTI scoring, re-creating feeds as connectors and repointing SIEM and EDR integrations.
Moving ThreatQ intelligence to MISP: exporting indicators and context, importing them as MISP events with taxonomies and galaxies, re-creating feeds, and replacing ThreatQ's pushes to detection tools with MISP exports and integrations.
Cost of ownership by component: ThreatQ licensing and any Securonix bundle, on-premises servers or SaaS, against OpenCTI and MISP on your own infrastructure, migration and the people who curate feeds and maintain connectors.
Securonix bought ThreatQuotient in June 2025 and says ThreatQ stays available standalone while integrating with its SIEM. For ThreatQ customers who do not run Securonix: what the stated plans mean for them and how a move to OpenCTI or MISP compares with staying.
Replacing ThreatQ TDR Orchestrator's intelligence-driven automation with open-source pieces: OpenCTI playbooks for enrichment and dissemination, MISP workflows, and Shuffle for actions in SIEM, EDR and ticketing tools, with what each covers.
Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.