Omada vs midPoint
Comparing Omada Identity Cloud with self-hosted midPoint: lifecycle, access reviews and risk features, connectors, SaaS on Azure versus software you run anywhere, and subscription versus open source with optional support.

Omada sells Omada Identity Cloud, a SaaS identity governance platform on Microsoft Azure, and a private variant run in the customer's Azure tenant. Pages here cover replacing it with self-hosted midPoint.
Comparing Omada Identity Cloud with self-hosted midPoint: lifecycle, access reviews and risk features, connectors, SaaS on Azure versus software you run anywhere, and subscription versus open source with optional support.
For Omada customers whose main need is provisioning and self-service: what Apache Syncope covers with ConnId connectors, admin and end-user UIs and its SSO component, and the governance features they would give up compared with Omada or midPoint.
Moving from Omada Identity Cloud to midPoint: exporting identities, roles and assignments, rebuilding connectors and HR source integration, porting access request and review processes, parallel running and the cutover of provisioning to target systems.
Cost of ownership by component: Omada subscription and implementation program, or Azure costs and operations for Identity Cloud Private, against midPoint with no license fee, an optional Evolveum subscription, infrastructure and the team that runs it.
For regulated European organizations comparing Omada Identity Cloud on Azure, Identity Cloud Private in their own Azure tenant and the announced containerized Omada Identity Sovereign with running midPoint today on infrastructure they or an EU provider control.

Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.