Adobe Experience Manager vs Strapi

A fair comparison for teams that mainly use AEM content fragments and headless delivery, covering Strapi's Community and Enterprise editions, what page authors lose without AEM's page editor, and the operating effort on each side.

On this page

Adobe Experience Manager vs Strapi: when a headless Strapi stack fits an AEM estate

A headless Strapi stack fits an AEM estate when most of the AEM use is content fragments delivered to apps or frontends, and the team has a reason to act before AEM 6.5 core support ends on February 28, 2027. Adobe's AEM 6.5 support timeline gives extended support with critical fixes only until February 28, 2028, so the decision is about the next two or three years, not an immediate cutover. AEM remains the better fit where the estate depends on page-authoring by marketing teams, the DAM, Forms, or tight integration with other Adobe products. Strapi fits where the content is structured data that the team can model as content types and serve through its REST and GraphQL APIs, running on infrastructure the organization controls.

Before committing, list every fragment model and check how many are consumed by pages that editors assemble in AEM's page editor. Those pages do not map to Strapi, which has no visual page composition. Next, inventory the DAM: Strapi handles media uploads, but rights metadata, renditions and asset workflows need to be rebuilt or supplied by another system. Confirm whether the organization needs Strapi Enterprise features. In the self-hosted pricing, SSO for administrators is an add-on on Growth and included in Enterprise, while audit logs and review workflows are Enterprise features. Check these against your identity provider and editorial approval rules, using the current Strapi self-hosted pricing page rather than older figures.

The decision also turns on skills. Strapi 5 runs on Active or Maintenance LTS Node.js versions and supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and SQLite, but not MongoDB. Your team needs to operate a Node.js application, its database, backups and upgrades, and Strapi's release cadence is frequent, so budget time for regular patching. If your Java or AEM operations staff will carry this, plan training or a fixed-scope implementation partner. If the team already runs Node.js services, the operating model is familiar. Answer these three questions in writing: how much page authoring and DAM depend on AEM, which Strapi edition your security and governance requirements need, and whether your engineers can run the stack after handover.

Which option fits which team

This table maps common AEM team profiles to the platform that fits each one better, with the reason and the points where edition or in-house skills change the answer. Read each row against your current AEM usage, then check the edition and skills notes before shortlisting.

Team scenarioBetter fitReason and what depends on edition or skills
Headless-only content fragments delivered to apps and sitesStrapiStrapi's REST and GraphQL APIs cover fragment-style delivery and both are included in every self-hosted plan. Teams with JavaScript skills will find the content type model familiar, but the frontend is still built separately.
Page authors who need drag-and-drop templates and in-context editingAEM Sites, or a page-centric open-source CMSStrapi is a content API and admin panel, not a page editor with visual templates. Confirm whether your frontend framework can supply the in-context preview your authors expect before you commit.
Heavy DAM use with rendition management and Adobe Target or Analytics integrationAEM, unless you plan a separate DAM and analytics stackStrapi has media storage but not an enterprise digital asset management layer, and Adobe integrations would need custom work. Confirm the integration list with your Adobe contract and your own marketing team.
Regulated teams that need audit logs and approval workflowsStrapi Enterprise, or AEMAudit logs and review workflows are listed as Enterprise features on Strapi's self-hosted plans, so Community Edition is not enough for this need. Ask Strapi for the current Enterprise terms and confirm the logs meet your retention rules.
Teams requiring SSO for admin users through an existing identity providerStrapi Growth with SSO add-on, or Strapi EnterpriseSSO covers administrator login only, and end-user authentication is handled by the Users and Permissions plugin. Your identity team should confirm this split matches your access model.
Small internal team with Node.js and PostgreSQL skills and modest governance needsStrapi Community EditionThe Community Edition is MIT licensed and free, with unlimited users. Operating effort falls on your team for upgrades, backups and hosting, so the skills gap is the main risk.
Organizations with no in-house Node.js operations capacityConfirm before choosing either optionSelf-hosting Strapi needs a team to run the database, Node.js runtime and upgrades. A managed AEM contract may suit teams that cannot take on this operating load, so compare the operating effort honestly.

Where content and identity sit under each option

AEM Sites comes in three deployment shapes, and each one places content and identity with a different party. Self-hosted AEM 6.5 runs in infrastructure your organization operates, so the repository, author and publish instances and the database sit where you place them. Adobe Managed Services runs AEM 6.5 on Adobe-operated infrastructure under your agreement. AEM as a Cloud Service runs on a subscription with continuous updates on Adobe's platform. Data location for the managed options depends on region and contract, so confirm it in writing before you assume a jurisdiction.

  • Self-hosted AEM 6.5: you control the hosts, backups and network paths, and you carry patching for the Java and repository stack.
  • Adobe Managed Services: Adobe operates the AEM 6.5 environment, and the contract defines which operational tasks Adobe handles and which remain yours.
  • AEM as a Cloud Service: content sits in Adobe's subscription platform, and updates follow Adobe's release cadence.
  • Edge Delivery Services: on the Cloud Service path, delivery runs through Adobe's edge layer, so ask where cached copies are stored.

Ask Adobe for the hosting region, subprocessor list and data processing terms for your contract before comparing locations with a Strapi deployment. Understanding AEM Sites offerings sets out the three options.

What a page-authoring team loses without AEM's page editor

Strapi is a content API with an admin panel, not a visual page composer. Content types, entries, media and the REST and GraphQL endpoints are what Strapi provides. Page layout, the arrangement of components on a page, in-context editing on a live preview and the component-driven page tree that AEM Sites authors use every day do not exist in Strapi. Those capabilities move into a separate frontend application that your team builds and runs, usually in a framework such as Next.js or Astro. Before you commit, ask the team which pages are assembled by editors today and confirm that each layout decision can be expressed as a Strapi content type plus frontend code.

AEM's page editor depends on its component model: editable components, dialogs, templates and policies that define what an author can change on a page. Each of those needs a counterpart in the new stack. A practical approach is to map each AEM template to a Strapi collection or single type, each component to a reusable block (typically a dynamic zone or component in Strapi's model), and each editable region to a field with validation rules. Expect the frontend to own rendering and the preview route, and plan for the preview to be built as a separate feature rather than assumed from the CMS. The mapping exercise also exposes components that exist only for AEM's authoring tools and can be dropped.

Review and history also change by edition. Strapi's pricing page lists content history and releases from the Growth plan, while review workflows and audit logs are Enterprise features. A team that relies on AEM's approval chains should confirm, with Strapi, whether the workflow it needs is available at the edition it can license, or whether it must build approval steps around the API. Ask for a written list of the workflow stages, roles and publish permissions your editors use today, and test each one on the chosen edition before moving pages. Editors who lose in-context editing will need training on the new preview and publishing flow, and that training is a one-time cost to include in the plan.

Cost components on each side

Costs on the AEM side come from a license or subscription, specialist services and the content estate itself. Costs on the Strapi side come from the plan you choose, the infrastructure you run and the engineering work to rebuild authoring and delivery. Each card below marks what is one-time and what recurs, and what moves the number.

AEM license or subscription

On the AEM side, this is the recurring line that funds Adobe's product, support and updates. The AEM 6.5 on-premise path, the AEM 6.5 LTS path and AEM as a Cloud Service each carry different commercial terms, so the figure depends on which one you buy. AEM and partner prices are not published in the sources used for this page. Request a written quote that states the term, the number of environments, the included support level and what happens to the subscription when your exit date is set.

Strapi plan fees

Strapi's self-hosted Community Edition is free and includes REST and GraphQL APIs. The Growth plan is listed at 45 US dollars per month including 3 users, plus 15 dollars per extra user, according to Strapi's self-hosted pricing page. Enterprise is custom priced. SSO is an add-on on Growth and included in Enterprise, while audit logs and review workflows are Enterprise features. Recurring cost rises with editor seats and with the features your authoring process needs, so list required features before you choose a tier.

Strapi Cloud as an alternative

If you want Strapi to host the platform, Strapi Cloud is priced per project, listed at 35 US dollars per month for Starter, 90 for Pro and 450 for Business, according to Strapi's Cloud pricing page. Business includes a 99.9% uptime SLA. This is a recurring fee that replaces most of your own hosting and database work, but it still leaves the frontend build and content migration with you. Compare it with your self-hosted run cost before choosing hosting.

Hosting, database and Node.js operations

Self-hosting Strapi 5 means running a Node.js application on an active or maintenance LTS version, with PostgreSQL 14 or later, MySQL 8.0 or later, MariaDB 10.3 or later, or SQLite 3, according to Strapi's installation requirements. MongoDB is not supported. Recurring costs include compute, storage, backups, monitoring and the staff who patch the runtime. Ask your team to size these for your peak editorial and read traffic, and to confirm which database your security baseline allows.

Frontend build and content migration

This is largely one-time work. AEM content fragments must be exported, mapped to Strapi content types and imported, and the frontend that AEM Sites rendered must be rebuilt because Strapi delivers content through APIs only. Effort scales with the number of fragment models, locales and channels, and with how much of the rendering logic lived in AEM components. Ask any implementation partner for a fixed-scope written estimate that lists models, pages and redirects separately, and confirm who owns the frontend after launch.

DAM replacement and upgrades

AEM Assets is not replaced by Strapi's content types. Your assets need a separate digital asset store or media service, with its own licence or hosting cost, and a process for metadata and renditions. Strapi upgrades also recur: Strapi 5 minor releases have shipped roughly weekly, and v4 reached end of life on April 30, 2026. Budget for a standing upgrade cycle, codemods for any v4 code and a database backup before each major move, since downgrade is not supported.

How an AEM content fragment move to Strapi runs

The sequence below takes AEM content fragments and assets into a self-hosted Strapi stack, with a check at each stage that confirms content, delivery and URLs survived the move before traffic is switched.

  1. Inventory fragment models and their usage

    Your content architects and frontend leads list every content fragment model, its fields, variations and references, and record which pages, components and API consumers read each model. Editorial owners confirm which models are still active. Done means a signed inventory that shows each model's fields, its consumers and whether it is in scope for the first release. Ask for this inventory as a deliverable before any export starts.

  2. Export repository content from AEM

    The migration team exports fragment content, its folder structure and the related asset references from AEM using Package Manager, which produces zip packages in Jackrabbit FileVault format scoped by filters. Engineers check the package contents against the inventory, since previous versions are not included and must be decided separately. Done means each in-scope fragment set has a package that parses cleanly and whose record counts match the source.

  3. Map fragment models to Strapi content types

    Engineers translate each AEM fragment model into a Strapi content type with matching fields, relations, locales and draft or publish settings, then write the transform scripts that convert parsed package data into Strapi records. Strapi 5 uses the Document Service API and its own response format, so field names and nesting in API responses will change, and the frontend contract must be defined against the new shape. Done means a mapping document is approved and a sample set of fragments loads into a staging Strapi instance with correct values.

  4. Migrate assets and references

    The team moves images, documents and other binary files from the AEM DAM into storage the new stack controls, then rewrites the references in migrated content so they point to the new locations. Renditions and metadata are checked against what editors actually use. Done means a sample of assets resolves from every migrated fragment and the asset counts reconcile with the export.

  5. Rebuild the frontend and API consumers

    Frontend developers rebuild the components that render fragments and update every API consumer, including mobile apps, search indexes and partner integrations, to call Strapi's REST or GraphQL endpoints. Access rules move from AEM's model to Strapi roles and the Users and Permissions plugin, and admin login can use SSO where your plan includes it. Done means each consumer has been updated and its responses have been checked against the mapping document.

  6. Test delivery and editorial workflows

    QA and editorial teams run functional tests on content delivery, previews, publishing and access control, then have editors perform their real tasks in Strapi. Where AEM page editing or workflow steps are not replaced by Strapi, the team records the gap and the agreed workaround. Done means a signed test report covers delivery results, editorial sign-off and each open gap with an owner.

  7. Redirect URLs from the old structure

    SEO and platform engineers map every public URL from the AEM site structure to its new route, implement permanent redirects at the edge or in the frontend, and check that canonical tags, sitemaps and internal links point to the new addresses. Done means a crawl of the old URL list returns the expected redirect or content response for every entry.

  8. Cut over and retire the AEM source

    The team freezes content changes for the cutover window, runs a final export and delta load, switches DNS or delivery routing to the new stack, and monitors errors and redirects. AEM stays available read-only until your retention rules allow decommissioning. Done means production traffic is served from Strapi, the rollback plan has been rehearsed, and the final export is archived with a record of what it contains.

What running Strapi yourself asks of your team

Running Strapi yourself means your team owns the runtime, the database and every upgrade. Strapi 5 supports PostgreSQL 14 or later, MySQL 8.0 or later, MariaDB 10.3 or later and SQLite 3, and it does not support MongoDB or other NoSQL databases. It also runs only on Active or Maintenance LTS Node.js versions, so your platform team needs a written Node.js version policy that tracks the Strapi installation requirements. Confirm which database engine your DBA team already operates and back it up on a schedule that matches your content change rate. The rest of the stack, including hosting, TLS, monitoring and the frontend, is also yours to run.

The upgrade path is the most time-sensitive part of the operating effort. Strapi v4 reached end of life on April 30, 2026, and its final release, 4.26.2 of June 9, 2026, receives no further updates. Teams still on v4 need the v4 to v5 migration, which uses an upgrade tool with codemods, data migration scripts that run on first start of Strapi 5, and a breaking changes list. The migration docs say to back up the database first because downgrading is not supported, so treat that backup as a restore point you must be able to use. Strapi 5 also replaces the Entity Service API with the Document Service API and changes the response format, so budget time for testing every API consumer. Strapi 5 minor releases have shipped roughly weekly, for example v5.56.0 on September 30 and v5.57.0 on October 7, 2026, so set a review cadence and a staging environment that can absorb them.

AEM sets a different clock. Core support for AEM 6.5 on-premise runs until February 28, 2027, and extended support with critical fixes only runs until February 28, 2028, so AEM customers plan around vendor dates rather than weekly releases. Ask your AEM partner or Adobe account team which staff roles the current estate depends on, such as AEM administrators, Java developers and repository specialists, and compare that list with the Node.js, database and DevOps skills a Strapi estate needs. Both sides carry effort, but the Strapi effort is continuous and sits inside your own team, so decide early whether you will staff that work or contract it, and write the support model into the migration plan.

Questions buyers ask before choosing Strapi over AEM

How much does moving from AEM to Strapi cost, and what drives it?

The cost has two parts: the software licence and the people who do the work. Strapi Community Edition is free to download and run, so the recurring software line depends on whether you need Growth or Enterprise features, and on hosting. The Strapi self-hosted pricing page lists Growth at 45 US dollars per month including 3 users, with 15 dollars per extra user, and Enterprise at custom pricing. The largest cost is usually one-time: rebuilding content models, the frontend, redirects and assets, plus the time of your internal team and any implementation partner. Ask any vendor for a written quote that separates one-time migration work from recurring hosting, support and upgrades, and that lists each assumption about content volume and integrations.

How long does a Strapi migration from AEM take?

Duration depends on scope rather than on Strapi alone. The factors that move the timeline most are the number of fragment models, the volume and state of DAM assets, how many channels consume the content, how much frontend work is involved, and how many URLs must be redirected. Strapi's own migration guide covers v4 to v5 upgrades, which is a separate task from leaving AEM. Ask for a timeline tied to a written scope with named deliverables, and check it against the AEM 6.5 support dates you must plan around.

What must our internal team supply for the move?

Your team has to own decisions that no implementation partner can make for you: the target content model, editorial approval rules, which sites and locales stay in scope, the frontend framework and hosting, and who signs off on redirects and content cut-over. Your engineers will also need access to the AEM repository for export, a named owner for the database and Node.js runtime, and time for content review. Confirm these roles early, because the work stalls when they are unassigned.

Can our own team do the Strapi migration without an outside partner?

Yes, if you have engineers who know Node.js, relational databases and your frontend stack, and if the estate is small enough to move in stages. Strapi 5 runs on PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB or SQLite and does not support MongoDB, so a team already running a supported relational database has less to learn. A fixed-scope engagement from DeployOpen usually fits better when the estate is large, when the team lacks Strapi or deployment experience, or when audit evidence must be produced. DeployOpen plans, implements, hardens, backs up and documents self-hosted platforms in your own infrastructure, and agrees scope and deliverables in writing before work starts.

Which Strapi edition do we need for SSO and audit logs?

Community Edition does not include the Enterprise features you may need for governance. In Strapi's self-hosted plans, SSO is an add-on for Growth and included in Enterprise, while audit logs and review workflows are Enterprise features. Content history and releases start at the Growth plan. Strapi SSO applies only to administrator login to the admin panel, through an identity provider such as Microsoft Azure Active Directory. End-user login is handled separately by the Users and Permissions plugin. Code in ee directories falls under the Enterprise license, so confirm your entitlement in the Strapi LICENSE file and with Strapi before relying on those directories.

Can Strapi replace AEM Digital Asset Management?

Strapi can store and serve assets through its media handling, but it is not a drop-in replacement for AEM Assets. AEM's DAM covers metadata workflows, renditions, rights and search across large libraries, and Strapi does not provide those as a complete system. Before you commit, list which AEM DAM features your editors use daily, then decide whether to build them on Strapi, add a separate DAM, or keep AEM Assets during a transition. Confirm the exact asset features with Strapi's documentation and test them on a representative library.

How do we confirm our database and Node.js versions work with Strapi?

Check the installation requirements for your target Strapi version before you choose infrastructure. The Strapi installation docs list PostgreSQL 14 or later, MySQL 8.0 or later, MariaDB 10.3 or later and SQLite 3, and state that Strapi 5 does not support MongoDB or other NoSQL databases. The same page says Strapi runs only on Active or Maintenance LTS Node.js versions. Confirm the current version list on that page at the time you plan, because Strapi releases frequently. Also note that Strapi v4 reached end of life on April 30, 2026, so a new build should target Strapi 5.

Where DeployOpen helps and where your team must decide

Moving from AEM content fragments to Strapi is mostly a set of decisions about the content model, the frontend and the evidence you need afterward. DeployOpen can plan, build and test the parts that are technical work, while your editorial, legal and business owners decide what the new system must still do.

Fit assessment before any build

Start by inventorying which AEM capabilities your teams actually use: content fragments, Assets, the page editor, workflows, translation and any Forms or Targeting. A written fit assessment shows which of these Strapi covers through its content types and APIs and which need a separate tool or a rebuild. It also records what your page authors will lose, so that decision is made in advance. Ask for the assessment to be signed off by the content owners, not only by IT.

Strapi implementation and hardening

DeployOpen can install and configure self-hosted Strapi in your own cloud account or data center, with a supported database such as PostgreSQL, a supported Node.js version and your chosen identity provider for administrator login. Hardening covers network exposure, secrets handling, backups and role design. Confirm which features you need from the Community Edition and which need an Enterprise license, such as audit logs and review workflows, before the design is fixed.

Frontend and integration rebuild

Strapi delivers content through REST and GraphQL APIs, so the AEM-rendered pages, component templates and any AEM-to-downstream integrations must be rebuilt as separate frontend and service work. DeployOpen can scope this work against your current URL structure, caching and search needs, and your marketing or analytics connectors. Ask which integrations are driven by AEM's Sling models or servlets, since those do not carry over directly.

Migration planning and content mapping

Content fragment models must be mapped to Strapi content types, and assets, locales and references must be moved and re-linked. Plan the export from the AEM repository, the transformation scripts and a parallel run where both systems can be compared. Your team must decide which legacy versions and draft states are worth keeping, because older AEM package versions are not part of a standard export.

Security testing of the new stack

A new headless CMS adds an admin panel, public and authenticated APIs, a frontend and plugins, each with its own attack surface. DeployOpen runs application and API security testing against the Strapi installation, its permission model and the frontend, and reports findings with fixes. Decide who owns patching for Strapi itself, because the upgrade path from v4 to v5 has already changed how the platform is maintained.

Compliance readiness evidence

If your AEM estate supports regulated content, you will need evidence that access, change and backup controls work on the new system. DeployOpen can prepare control design, configuration records, access reviews and backup test results for your assessors. DeployOpen does not issue audit reports or certifications; your independent auditor or certification body makes that determination. Agree the evidence list with your auditor before implementation starts.

How DeployOpen helps teams evaluate and move off AEM content fragments

DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates, hardens, backs up and documents self-hosted open-source platforms inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped networks. For teams weighing AEM content fragments against a self-hosted Strapi stack, we start by writing down what your content model, delivery APIs and editors actually need.

How we scope

  • We inventory AEM content fragment models, delivery endpoints and the editors who depend on them
  • We document which page-authoring features your team would lose and which need a separate frontend
  • Engagements are fixed-scope, with deliverables and timelines agreed in writing before work starts

How we build

  • We install Strapi in your environment and map fragment models to Strapi content types
  • We configure REST and GraphQL access, roles and SSO for administrators in line with your edition choice
  • We test API responses, asset handling and backups in a staging environment before any cutover

How we hand over

  • We deliver architecture notes, model mappings, runbooks for upgrades and backup restore procedures
  • We document the Strapi edition and license terms your team has agreed to, and what they cover
  • We walk your administrators through content editing, releases and the ongoing operating routine

How we support

  • Ongoing support, upgrades and continuous testing are available as retainers after handover
  • Retainers can cover Strapi version upgrades, security patching and recurring restore tests
  • We prepare the controls and evidence your compliance assessors may ask for, without issuing any certification

Talk to our team.

Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.

  • 30-minute call: free, with no obligation.
  • NDA on request: we can sign before you share details.
  • Clear next steps: a scope and plan after the call.