Kong Konnect vs Gravitee: which fits your API estate
Konnect fits teams that want Kong to run the control plane and are content with a SaaS console. If your Konnect renewal is coming up, or metered billing for developer portals and published APIs is hard to forecast, the question is whether you still want Kong operating the management layer. Konnect's control plane is Kong-managed, while data plane nodes can be self-hosted, run as serverless gateways, or run as Dedicated Cloud Gateways on AWS, Azure or GCP. Self-hosted Gravitee fits teams that need the management API, the Console UI for administrators and the Portal UI in their own environment. Gravitee's repository describes these as the components of APIM, and its README lists Kubernetes via Helm and Docker Compose with MongoDB as self-hosted routes. Neither choice is wrong by default; the fit depends on where your obligations sit.
Start with data location, because it decides whether the SaaS control plane is even an option. Ask where API configuration, consumer records, subscription data and usage metrics must reside, and whether any of that must stay inside your network. If the answer is "inside our own network," a Kong-hosted control plane is a poor fit regardless of price, and Gravitee's self-hosted deployment becomes the main candidate to evaluate. Confirm with Gravitee which of its Enterprise deployment models (SaaS, hybrid or fully self-hosted) your contract would cover, and confirm with Kong which parts of Konnect would remain outside your control under your data processing terms.
Then map the Enterprise Edition features you actually need, and who will run the platform. Gravitee's Community Edition is self-hosted, but its Enterprise Edition requires a license and adds items such as audit trails of API consumption and activity, data masking, Dynamic Client Registration, Redis caching and MCP and LLM proxies. Compare that list against the Konnect features your team depends on, and price both sides from written quotes. Self-hosting shifts cost from Kong's subscription to your infrastructure, upgrades, backups and on-call work, so the deciding factor is whether your platform team has the capacity to run a Java-based stack with a database and a portal as a production service. If that capacity is not there, a fixed-scope implementation with ongoing support may be the honest comparison to Konnect.
Which option fits which scenario
This table matches common team situations to the platform that fits better, with one reason each. Read it against your own constraints: where the control plane must sit, which Kong plugins you depend on, and which Gravitee Enterprise features are in scope.
| Scenario | Better fit | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| SaaS is acceptable and the platform group is small | Kong Konnect | A Kong-managed control plane removes the need to operate a management stack, so a small team can focus on gateway policies and routes. |
| Control plane must stay in your own country or data center | Gravitee API Management (self-hosted) | Gravitee's Community Edition is self-hosted, so the management API, Console and Portal can run entirely inside your network, which Konnect's Kong-hosted control plane does not allow. |
| Bundled developer portal and admin console are central | Gravitee API Management | The Console UI and Portal UI ship as components of the same platform, so you do not need to meter or license a separate portal to publish APIs. |
| Heavy reliance on Kong plugins and decK workflows | Kong Konnect or self-run Kong Gateway OSS | Your existing plugin configuration and decK exports map directly to Kong, so moving to Gravitee means rebuilding policies and plans by hand. |
| Gravitee Enterprise features are required | Gravitee Enterprise Edition (confirm licensing) | Features such as data masking, GeoIP filtering and the Alert Engine need an Enterprise license, so budget and compare the license terms against Konnect's metered fees before deciding. |
| Event and messaging endpoints such as Kafka, MQTT or RabbitMQ are in scope | Gravitee Enterprise Edition (confirm coverage) | Gravitee lists these endpoints among its Enterprise Edition features, so confirm they meet your needs before assuming Konnect's options cover the same protocols. |
How the two architectures divide responsibilities
In the SaaS model, the control plane is hosted by the vendor and you consume it as a service. Kong Konnect is a SaaS platform with a Kong-managed control plane, where you define services, routes, plugins and portals in Kong's console and APIs. Gravitee also offers Gravitee Cloud SaaS on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud for its management layer, so the same split between hosted management and your traffic path appears on both sides.
- Control plane location: Konnect's control plane is run by Kong. Gravitee Cloud is run by Gravitee on the cloud providers it lists.
- Data plane options: Konnect data planes can be self-hosted, run as serverless gateways, or run as Dedicated Cloud Gateways that Kong manages on AWS, Azure or GCP.
- Upgrades and patching: The vendor schedules upgrades of the hosted control plane, so your team mainly tracks release notes and deprecations.
- Metered usage: Konnect pricing depends on plan and metered items, so cost tracks how your usage grows.
- Data exposure: Configuration and usage metadata leave your environment for the vendor-hosted control plane.
Confirm with each vendor which regions host the control plane, what metadata it stores, and how audit logs are exported to your SIEM.
In the self-hosted model, you run every component inside your own infrastructure, including the gateway, the management API backend, the Console UI for administrators and the Portal UI for developers. Gravitee documents a fully self-hosted deployment for Enterprise customers and describes the Community Edition as self-hosted. Gravitee's repository lists a Helm chart for Kubernetes, including AKS, GKE, EKS and OpenShift, and Docker Compose with MongoDB as ways to run APIM, so the control plane stays on your own clusters or hosts.
- Components you operate: The gateway, management API, Console UI and Portal UI all run in your environment, backed by the database you select.
- Deployment paths: The repository README points to Helm on Kubernetes and Docker Compose with MongoDB.
- Versioning: The repository was tagged core_4.13.1 on October 15, 2026, and the documentation covers API Management 4.12, so confirm which line your deployment targets before you install.
- Licensing: The Apache-2.0 repository is open source, but Enterprise features require a Gravitee Enterprise License, so check which features your plan depends on.
- Ownership: Your team handles backups, database operations, certificates, upgrades and incident response for the control plane.
Ask Gravitee which Enterprise features are included in a fully self-hosted license and which, if any, depend on a connection to Gravitee services.
The hybrid model splits responsibilities between a managed control layer and gateways that run in your environment. Gravitee documents hybrid deployment for Enterprise customers, which keeps the gateways that carry API traffic inside your network while the management layer is run by the vendor. Kong's model is similar in shape: Konnect's control plane is Kong-managed, while the data plane nodes you self-host stay in your infrastructure. The practical question is where your traffic, credentials and configuration are allowed to go.
- Traffic stays local: API requests pass through gateways you operate, so latency and payload exposure depend on your network design.
- Configuration crosses the boundary: Routes, policies and analytics data still move between the gateway and the management plane, so review what each side stores.
- Connectivity dependency: Your gateways need a working path to the management layer for configuration sync, so plan for outages in that path.
- Split responsibilities: The vendor typically runs the management layer, while your team runs the gateways, certificates and network policy.
- Contract scope: Hybrid is an Enterprise deployment option for Gravitee, so the license terms define what you receive.
Confirm what happens to live traffic if the management connection is lost, and which data crosses the boundary in both directions.
Data location, identity and compliance implications
These four cards cover where configuration and analytics are stored, how disconnected networks are affected, how identity and access are governed, and what evidence your team must produce. Together they show which controls move with the platform and which stay with your own team.
Where configuration and analytics live
Konnect keeps its control plane in Kong-managed SaaS, so route definitions, consumer metadata and analytics are held in Kong's environment, while data plane nodes can run on your side. Gravitee APIM, when self-hosted, keeps its gateway, management API backend, Console and Portal in infrastructure you choose, deployed through a Helm chart on Kubernetes or Docker Compose with MongoDB. Ask Kong which metadata and analytics records leave your network, where they are stored and how long they are kept. Confirm the same for your Gravitee database, logs and metrics.
Disconnected and residency-constrained networks
A Konnect data plane can be self-hosted, but its configuration is still driven by a Kong-hosted control plane, so a network with no outbound path cannot use Konnect as designed. Gravitee documents fully self-hosted deployment for Enterprise customers, and its Community Edition is self-hosted, so the management stack can sit inside an isolated segment. Confirm with Gravitee that your chosen edition, plugins and license checks work without internet access. Confirm with Kong how Konnect behaves during a connectivity loss before you rely on it for residency-bound traffic.
Identity and access controls
Konnect access is governed by Kong's organization and team roles in its console, so your administrators sign in through the vendor's identity model. Gravitee's Console and Portal manage their own users, roles and API access, so you must map those roles to your identity provider and decide who may publish APIs, approve subscriptions and rotate client credentials. Enterprise Edition adds Dynamic Client Registration, which changes who can create credentials, so review it against your joiner, mover and leaver process. Test single sign-on and MFA enforcement on each console during evaluation.
Compliance evidence you produce
Whichever platform you choose, your team owns the evidence an assessor will request: access review records, change approvals for routes and policies, log retention settings, backup and restore tests, and vendor data-flow documentation. Gravitee Enterprise lists audit trails of API consumption and activity, so confirm that they export to your SIEM and how long they persist. DeployOpen prepares controls and evidence but does not issue audit reports, and independent auditors perform that assessment.
What each option costs to run
What does Kong Konnect charge for, and what recurs?
Konnect is billed as a subscription with usage components, so the cost recurs for as long as the service runs. Ask Kong for a written quote that lists each metered item separately: the plan tier, gateway services, requests, developer portals and published APIs, and any Dedicated Cloud Gateway capacity. Konnect's control plane is Kong-managed, so you pay for the service rather than for servers you operate. Costs rise as traffic grows, as more APIs are published, and as you add portals. Check whether your data plane nodes are self-hosted, serverless or Dedicated Cloud Gateways, because each choice changes which line items apply.
Is Gravitee Community Edition free to run?
The Community Edition is Apache-2.0 licensed and self-hosted, so there is no license fee for the software itself. The costs are the infrastructure, the people who install and operate it, and any outside support you buy. Gravitee documents that some features need a Gravitee Enterprise License, so confirm in writing which capabilities your use case requires before assuming Community covers them. Enterprise Edition is a separate license cost that recurs, and its price should come from Gravitee's quote, not from this page.
What infrastructure does a self-hosted Gravitee deployment need?
A production Gravitee APIM deployment runs several components: the gateway, the management API backend, the Console UI, the Portal UI, and the data stores behind them. The repository's README lists MongoDB for Docker Compose installs, and Redis appears among Enterprise Edition features for caching. Each component adds compute, storage, backups and monitoring, and the gateway scales with request volume. Ask your architect to size each tier in your own environment and to show the MongoDB and Redis hosting model, whether managed or self-run, since that choice drives both one-time setup and recurring operating cost.
How do Kubernetes and Docker Compose change operating costs?
The repository lists a Helm chart for Kubernetes, including AKS, GKE, EKS and OpenShift, and Docker Compose with MongoDB as install paths. Compose is simpler for evaluation and small footprints, but production usually points to Kubernetes, which adds cluster costs and skills requirements. If your platform team already runs a cluster, the marginal cost is lower. If not, cluster operations become a recurring line item. Compare the cost of an in-house platform engineer against a support arrangement, and ask which path each quote assumes.
What ongoing work should I budget for with self-hosted Gravitee?
Recurring work includes version upgrades, security patching, backup and restore testing, monitoring, certificate rotation and capacity planning. Gravitee's tagged releases and documentation versions differ, so plan upgrade windows and test them in a non-production environment first. Konnect moves much of this to Kong, which is a real trade-off to weigh. Budget engineer hours for each activity, and decide whether they sit with your team, a managed support contract, or a fixed-scope implementation partner such as DeployOpen, which plans, hardens, backs up, upgrades and supports self-hosted platforms in your infrastructure under written scope.
Which costs are one-time and which recur in a Gravitee migration?
One-time costs include discovery, mapping existing services, routes and plugins to Gravitee APIs, plans and policies, building the environment, testing and cutover. Recurring costs include infrastructure, licenses, support, upgrades, backups and staff time. Konnect's subscription and metered usage recur throughout the comparison period, so the break-even point depends on your traffic, API count and portal use. Ask any implementation partner for a fixed-scope written proposal that separates these phases, and ask Gravitee and Kong for itemized quotes so the comparison is like for like.
What should I put in a written quote to compare Konnect and Gravitee fairly?
Ask each vendor, and any implementation partner, for a quote that lists every component on its own line. For Konnect, list the plan, gateway services, request volume assumptions, developer portals, published APIs, data plane hosting model, and support tier. For self-hosted Gravitee, list the Community or Enterprise license, cloud or Kubernetes hosting, gateway and management node counts, MongoDB and Redis hosting, backup storage, monitoring, upgrades, and support hours. Use the same traffic and API volume assumptions for every quote, and confirm which features each option includes, since Enterprise-only items such as audit trails and the Alert Engine can change the total.
What moving from Konnect to Gravitee involves
The sequence turns Konnect's gateway configuration, plugins and consumers into a self-hosted Gravitee APIM setup with its own console and portal, and ends with a tested cutover that you can roll back. Each step produces a record you can check before the next one begins.
Inventory services, routes, plugins and consumers
Your platform or API team lists every Konnect gateway service, route, plugin, consumer, credential and developer portal page in use, and marks which ones carry production traffic. Include the Konnect control plane settings, such as authentication for the portal and any Enterprise plugins. The output is a spreadsheet or table with one row per API, its owners, its consumers and its plugin chain. You know this step is done when every production API has an owner and every plugin has a noted purpose.
Export Kong configuration with decK
An engineer with Konnect access uses decK to dump the gateway configuration to a declarative YAML or JSON file, then stores it in version control with the date and control plane name. Confirm the decK version matches your Konnect control plane, and check that the export includes the services, routes, consumers and plugins you inventoried. Secrets and consumer credentials may not be included in a standard dump, so note those separately. The export is complete when a second engineer can read the file and match it to the inventory.
Map Kong objects to Gravitee APIs, plans and policies
The architecture team maps each Kong service and route to a Gravitee API with its entrypoints and endpoints, and maps consumer access to Gravitee plans and subscriptions. Kong plugins do not map one-to-one to Gravitee policies, so each plugin receives a status of direct equivalent, configured differently, Enterprise-only or no equivalent. Confirm the Enterprise-only items against the Gravitee Enterprise Edition documentation and your license. The mapping sheet is finished when every plugin has a status and an owner for the decision.
Build the Gravitee environment in your infrastructure
The platform team deploys the Gravitee gateway, management API, Console UI and Portal UI using the Helm chart for Kubernetes or Docker Compose with MongoDB, depending on your standards. They set up identity integration, TLS, logging and backup for the management store. Confirm the Gravitee version you run against the documentation version you are following, since the repository tags and documentation versions can differ. The environment is ready when a test API can be published, subscribed to and called through the gateway.
Rebuild the portal and API documentation
The API product owners recreate the catalog in the Gravitee Portal UI, including OpenAPI specifications, descriptions, access instructions and any onboarding pages that Konnect's developer portal previously held. Portal content is not carried over by a decK export, so each page is copied or rewritten by hand and reviewed by the owner. Check that consumers can register, see their plans and read the specifications. The step is done when every production API is listed in the portal with a reviewed specification.
Move consumers and credentials
The security and platform teams agree how each consumer gets new credentials, since Konnect keys and Gravitee subscriptions are not interchangeable. Options include issuing new API keys or client credentials, using OAuth2 or JWT with your existing identity provider, and notifying consumers on a fixed schedule. Credential material is moved through your secrets process, not pasted into tickets. The step closes when each consumer has a Gravitee subscription and a verified test call, with the consumer list signed off by the owner.
Run both gateways in parallel and test
Traffic is routed to Gravitee for a limited set of consumers or non-critical APIs while Konnect continues to serve the rest. Functional tests compare responses, headers, rate limits, authentication failures and logs between the two paths, and any plugin behavior flagged in the mapping is tested explicitly. Confirm that audit and log outputs reach your monitoring stack. This step is complete when the test log shows no unexplained differences for the scoped APIs and the open items are assigned.
Cut over and keep a rollback path
The team moves DNS, load balancer or client configuration API by API, following the order agreed in the inventory, and keeps Konnect routes active until each API has run successfully on Gravitee for an agreed period. Document the rollback steps for each API and rehearse one of them before the cutover window. Decommission Konnect data planes and the control plane only after the owners sign off and the final configuration export is archived. The step is done when all APIs serve traffic from Gravitee and the archived Konnect export is confirmed readable.
Questions buyers ask before switching
How much effort does moving from Kong Konnect to Gravitee take?
The effort depends mainly on how many services, routes, plugins and consumers sit in your Konnect configuration, and on how many of those plugins have a direct Gravitee policy. Start by exporting the gateway configuration with decK, then count the services, routes, consumers, plugins and developer portal assets you need to recreate. Teams with a small, mostly standard route set usually have a much shorter mapping exercise than teams with many custom plugins, custom authentication or multiple environments. No duration is set here because the figure depends on your environment. Ask any implementation partner for a written scope that lists each of these counts before agreeing to a timeline.
Can our internal team migrate from Konnect to Gravitee without outside help?
Yes, a capable internal team can do the migration, provided it has someone who knows Kong's configuration model and someone who knows Gravitee's API, plan and policy model. The work is mostly mapping and testing, not new software development. Internal teams often struggle with cutover planning, consumer communication and proving parity under production traffic, because those tasks compete with day-to-day operations. If you want outside help, ask for a fixed-scope engagement with written deliverables, so that the mapping, testing and cutover steps are agreed before work starts. DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates and documents self-hosted platforms in your own infrastructure, and most engagements are fixed-scope.
What skills and staff time does a Gravitee deployment need from us?
A self-hosted Gravitee deployment needs people who can operate the platform after go-live, not only people who can build it. Plan for the following roles:
- Platform engineers who run Kubernetes with the Helm chart, or Docker Compose with MongoDB for smaller setups.
- API owners who define plans, subscriptions and policies for each API.
- Security staff who set authentication, access rules and audit trail retention.
- Operations staff who handle upgrades, backups and monitoring.
The Gravitee repository README lists these deployment options, so confirm which one fits your environment. Staff time recurs after launch for upgrades, so ask any partner to document a run book as part of the scope.
Which Gravitee features require an Enterprise license?
Gravitee's documentation states that the APIM Enterprise Edition requires a license, while the Community Edition is self-hosted. Enterprise features listed in the documentation include Kafka publish and subscribe over HTTP and WebSocket, Azure Service Bus, MQTT5, RabbitMQ, Solace and JMS endpoints, Server-Sent Events and Webhook entrypoints, and audit trails of API consumption and activity. Data masking, GeoIP filtering, Dynamic Client Registration, the enterprise policy pack, the Alert Engine, Redis caching, Cloud Reporter, and Agent-to-Agent, LLM and MCP proxies are also listed there. Before you map any Konnect plugin, check each one against this list, because the licensing answer decides whether a plugin can move to the Community Edition at all. Confirm current terms with Gravitee directly.
How do we handle Kong plugins that have no direct Gravitee equivalent?
Handle each unmatched plugin as a separate decision with three outcomes: find an existing Gravitee policy that gives the same result, rebuild the behavior in an upstream service or a custom policy, or drop it because the requirement has changed. List every plugin in your decK export and mark it as mapped, rebuilt or retired before the cutover plan is approved. Custom Kong plugins written in Lua need the most review, since they cannot be moved as configuration. Test each replacement against the same request samples used for the Konnect baseline. Ask any partner to show this plugin inventory in the written scope.
Can we keep the Konnect developer portal running during cutover?
Yes, in most cases you can run the Konnect developer portal and the Gravitee Portal side by side during cutover, since they are separate systems. Konnect's portal stays live until you retire it, so consumers can keep reading documentation and managing credentials while you publish the same APIs in Gravitee. Plan a period where both portals show the same specs, and decide which portal consumers should use for new applications. Keeping two portals live adds operating cost and confusion, so set a retirement date in the plan. Confirm with Kong how your Konnect portal and any metered portal usage are billed during that overlap.
What does a Konnect to Gravitee move cost compared with staying on Konnect?
The cost comparison has four parts: the Konnect subscription and metered usage you stop paying, the infrastructure you start paying for to run Gravitee, the Gravitee license if you need Enterprise features, and the one-time labor for migration. Konnect bills by its own metered items, so the recurring saving depends on your actual usage, not on a list price. Gravitee Community Edition has no license fee, but infrastructure, upgrades, monitoring and staff time recur. Ask for a quote that separates one-time migration work from recurring run costs, and ask each vendor to state its licensing terms in writing. DeployOpen does not publish prices, and a quote follows from the written scope.
What to confirm with each vendor before you decide
Before you commit to either side, get written answers on the points that move the cost and migration picture most. Start with the current Konnect plan contents and metering terms. Konnect bills on plan tier and metered items such as gateway services, requests, developer portals and published APIs, and the exact units, included allowances and overage rules are set by Kong's current commercial terms, not by this page. Ask Kong for the plan that matches your traffic and portal count, the metering definitions in writing, and whether any of your planned usage (for example, a portal for internal teams or a second region) changes the bill. Those answers decide whether a self-run Gravitee deployment saves money or only shifts cost into your own engineering time.
On the Gravitee side, the question is which features your use case actually needs and under what license. The Community Edition is self-hosted and Apache-2.0, but Gravitee's documentation states that the Enterprise Edition requires a license, and features such as audit trails of API consumption and activity, data masking, GeoIP filtering, Dynamic Client Registration, Redis caching and the Alert Engine sit in that tier. Build a list of the policies, endpoints (for example Kafka, MQTT5, RabbitMQ or Server-Sent Events) and governance controls your APIs depend on, then ask Gravitee which edition and license terms cover each one. Also confirm the support terms, response expectations and whether a license covers hybrid or fully self-hosted deployment in your environment, using the Gravitee Enterprise Edition documentation as the starting point.
Confirm version support before you plan a pilot. The Gravitee repository was tagged core_4.13.1 on October 15, 2026, while the documentation you will read most often covers API Management 4.12. Ask which release line Gravitee supports for your chosen deployment (Helm chart on AKS, GKE, EKS or OpenShift, or Docker Compose with MongoDB), how long each line receives security fixes, and how upgrades between minor versions are handled. Ask Kong the same questions about the Konnect data plane versions your self-hosted nodes must match. Finally, ask both vendors for support commitments in writing, including what your team is responsible for in a self-run model. Your answers set the realistic run cost, which is what you will compare against the subscription line.
How DeployOpen helps you evaluate, implement or migrate
This sequence takes a team from an open question about leaving Konnect to a self-hosted Gravitee deployment with documented scope, tested behavior and a handover. Each step ends with a written output the team can review before the next one starts.
Confirm scope and written requirements
DeployOpen reviews your current Konnect usage with your platform and security leads, listing the gateway services, plugins, developer portal use, consumers, identity integration and any residency or air-gap constraints. Together you agree which capabilities must move, which can be dropped and which need a Gravitee Enterprise License. The output is a written scope document with deliverables and timelines, and nothing starts until both sides sign it.
Assess fit and licensing with your team
DeployOpen compares your required features against the Gravitee Community Edition and Enterprise Edition, and against the Apache-2.0 options you may also be weighing, such as Apache APISIX or Kong Gateway OSS. Your team confirms the licensing terms, the deployment model (Kubernetes with Helm, Docker Compose with MongoDB, or another target in your environment) and which Enterprise features you actually depend on. The output is a fit assessment that records each gap and the decision taken on it.
Design the target architecture
DeployOpen designs the Gravitee gateway, management API, Console and Portal topology inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped network. The design covers identity, secrets, logging, backup locations and network paths to your upstream services, and it states which components reach any external endpoint. Your security and infrastructure teams review and approve the design. The output is an architecture document and a list of open decisions with owners.
Implement and integrate the platform
DeployOpen deploys Gravitee APIM in your environment, configures the gateways, connects identity and monitoring, and sets up the Portal catalog for the APIs in scope. Where you need Enterprise-only capabilities, the license is installed and verified at this stage. The output is a running, non-production environment with a configuration record that your engineers can read and reproduce.
Map and migrate services, plans and consumers
DeployOpen exports the Konnect configuration with decK and translates services, routes and plugins into Gravitee APIs, plans and policies. Consumer applications and credentials are moved according to a written plan that agrees which consumers cut over first and how keys are rotated. Each mapped item is recorded with its source and target, and unmapped items are flagged for a decision. The output is a migration register that lists every object and its status.
Test behavior, security and performance
DeployOpen runs functional tests of routing, authentication, rate limits and policies against your expected traffic, and it can run application and API security testing on the Gravitee deployment if you contract it. Your team signs off on the results, and any defect is tracked to closure before cutover. The output is a test report with pass, fail and accepted-risk entries, signed by your owners.
Cut over, harden and set up backups
DeployOpen plans a staged cutover that moves traffic consumer group by consumer group, with a rollback path back to Konnect until you confirm the change. The production environment is hardened to your baseline, and backup and restore for the Gravitee management data are configured and tested. The output is a completed cutover record, a restore test result and a hardened configuration baseline.
Document, hand over and support
DeployOpen delivers runbooks, configuration documentation, upgrade notes and compliance-ready evidence of the controls implemented, so your team can operate the platform. Handover sessions transfer knowledge to your operators. Upgrades, ongoing support and continuous testing are available as separate retainers, priced from a written scope. DeployOpen prepares evidence for your compliance assessments but does not issue audit reports or certifications. The output is a handover pack signed off by your team.
