Migrate from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI

Moving from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI means moving conversation history, identity mapping, model access and the licensing check together. This page shows what moves cleanly, what needs rework and how to sequence the cutover.

On this page

Migrate from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI: what the move involves

Moving from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI is a platform change with four workstreams: data, identity, models and licensing. Renewal dates, data residency requirements and lock-in concerns usually trigger the review, but the project itself is a new deployment in your own infrastructure. ChatGPT Enterprise runs only as an OpenAI-hosted service, and the controls OpenAI documents for it (SAML SSO, admin retention settings, regional data residency and SOC 2 Type 2 audits) do not extend to a customer-hosted system. You are building a target environment, not changing a setting in the existing workspace. Platform or security engineering teams usually own this work, often with an implementation partner for the parts that need specialist time. Effort and risk depend mainly on three things: how much history must be preserved, how many identity groups must map cleanly to Open WebUI roles, and whether the models will be hosted by you or called through an API. Confirm early whether your team has the skills to operate PostgreSQL, Redis and shared file storage, because the Open WebUI scaling guide requires them for multi-replica deployments. Ask any partner for a written scope before work starts, including what is excluded.

On the data side, start with what the Enterprise Compliance API can return to admins for conversations and GPT records, then decide where that history will land and who can read it. Review retention policy on both sides before the cutover, so that OpenAI-side deletion timing and your own backup schedule are documented. On identity, confirm that your directory supports OIDC or LDAP for Open WebUI and plan how SCIM 2.0 provisioning will populate groups that drive role-based access. On models, decide between an API provider and self-hosted runtimes such as Ollama or vLLM, since that choice sets the recurring compute cost and the operational burden. The licensing workstream is the one most often missed. Open WebUI is governed by the Open WebUI License, which restricts removing or altering branding in deployments above 50 users in any rolling 30-day period unless you hold an enterprise license or written permission from the copyright holder. Confirm your expected user count with legal and procurement before rollout, and ask the Open WebUI team for an enterprise quote if branding changes are needed. Your license review should also cover the code version you deploy, because code through v0.6.5 remains under BSD-3-Clause.

Which ChatGPT Enterprise capabilities map to Open WebUI, and where the gaps are

This table maps each ChatGPT Enterprise capability to its closest Open WebUI equivalent and marks each row as clean, needs rework or gap. Read the status column first, then the cell notes, to see what you can move directly and what you must build, confirm or accept. Gaps are not failures: they tell you where your own operations and evidence take over from OpenAI's hosted controls.

CapabilityOpen WebUI equivalentStatus and what to confirm
SSO sign-inOIDC and LDAP sign-in, with SCIM 2.0 provisioning of users and groupsNeeds rework: SAML is not listed as a documented option, so confirm your identity provider supports OIDC or LDAP and map SAML apps through it
Group and role mappingRole-based access control with groups and per-resource permissionsNeeds rework: rebuild ChatGPT workspace roles as Open WebUI groups and test each permission against a pilot group
Admin retention settingsRetention set by your own database and storage policies, not a workspace toggleGap: you must write and enforce deletion schedules for chats, uploads and backups yourself
Conversation export through the Enterprise Compliance APIExport from ChatGPT through the Compliance API, then import or load into your own databaseNeeds rework: the export is admin-run and covers what OpenAI retrieves, so confirm coverage before cutover
Regional data residencyData stays wherever you host the database, index and model endpointsClean when hosted in your chosen region, but you must prove it with your own infrastructure records
Custom GPTsKnowledge collections, model presets and functionsNeeds rework: instructions, files and tools must be recreated and re-tested, and sharing rules rebuilt
Model choiceOllama, vLLM or any OpenAI-compatible API from one interfaceNeeds rework: pick and size models, and budget GPU or API capacity, since OpenAI models are not included
Admin audit logsLogs from your own reverse proxy, application and databaseGap: Open WebUI does not replace the ChatGPT audit log, so define which events you log and retain
SOC 2 Type 2 reportsNot inherited. Reports belong to OpenAI, and a self-hosted stack needs its own independent assessmentGap: your controls and evidence must be assessed separately, and DeployOpen prepares evidence but issues no reports

What data can leave ChatGPT Enterprise and what must be rebuilt

A ChatGPT Enterprise exit splits into three groups: records an admin can pull out, identity and group data that can be re-provisioned, and content and integrations that must be rebuilt by hand. Treat each group as a separate workstream with its own owner and acceptance check.

Conversations and GPT records

Workspace admins can view, export and delete end user conversations, and the Enterprise Compliance API is the documented route for retrieving conversations and GPT records. Ask OpenAI and your admin team exactly which conversation objects, attachments and GPT configurations the export returns, and whether deleted items are included. Confirm the output format before planning any import, because importing exports into Open WebUI depends on that format and should be proven in a pilot with a sample workspace.

Audit log and what the export leaves out

The audit log of conversations and GPTs is an admin-side record, and it is not the same thing as a full copy of every chat. Expect gaps in model settings, per-user preferences, shared links and any content that an end user deleted before export. Document these gaps in your migration record so auditors and the business owners understand what was preserved and what was not.

Identities and groups via SCIM and OIDC

Open WebUI documents SSO through OIDC and LDAP and SCIM 2.0 user and group provisioning, so group membership can come from your identity provider rather than a manual list. Map each ChatGPT Enterprise workspace group to an Open WebUI group and role before cutover, and check that admin, user and group permissions match the old access model. Do not carry over accounts by hand, since that breaks the link between identity and access reviews.

Uploaded files and knowledge to re-ingest

Files uploaded into ChatGPT conversations and any project knowledge are not something Open WebUI can assume it will receive intact from an export. Plan to collect the source documents from their original systems, then re-ingest them into Open WebUI knowledge collections and choose a vector database that fits your scale. Keep permissions on each collection aligned with the source system, and re-test retrieval answers against a known question set before users depend on them.

Custom GPT actions to rebuild

Custom GPT actions call external APIs using definitions and credentials held inside the OpenAI workspace, and those definitions do not move as working integrations. Inventory every GPT that calls an API, record its endpoints, authentication method and owner, then rebuild each one as a function, tool or model preset in the new stack. Test each rebuilt integration with its real credentials in a staging environment, and retire any GPT that nobody has used recently.

Migration sequence from inventory to decommission

This sequence moves a ChatGPT Enterprise workspace to a self-hosted Open WebUI deployment one group at a time, with each step producing a record that the next step depends on. It ends only when conversation data has been exported, retention obligations are met and the old workspace is closed.

  1. Build the inventory register

    Start by listing every user, group, custom GPT, shared conversation pattern, admin role and retention setting in the ChatGPT Enterprise workspace. Record which groups hold regulated data, which records must be kept for legal or audit reasons, and which compliance owner signs off on each category. Confirm the current retention configuration with the workspace admin and with your legal team rather than assuming defaults. The output is an inventory register with one row per group and one row per GPT, plus a named owner for each retention decision. The step is done when the compliance owner has reviewed and signed the register.

  2. Define the data-retention position

    Before any user moves, decide where conversation history will live after cutover and how long each category is kept in each system. Confirm with OpenAI what the Enterprise Compliance API returns for your workspace, and whether any export covers the audit log of conversations and GPTs that your auditors will ask for. Document the position in writing, including what is deleted from the ChatGPT side and when. The output is a signed retention position that names the Open WebUI database, log store and backup targets as the new system of record. The step is done when legal, security and the business owner have each approved it.

  3. Deploy the pilot environment in your infrastructure

    Deploy Open WebUI in your own cloud account, data center or isolated network using the Docker, Kubernetes with Helm, or pip install method that matches your platform standard. Use PostgreSQL rather than SQLite from the start if more than one instance is planned, and confirm the Redis and shared file storage requirements before any second replica is added. Connect the pilot to the model endpoints chosen in the model decision step, and configure logging and backup. The output is a documented build record with versions, configuration and network paths. The step is done when the platform team has rebuilt the environment from that record.

  4. Run a pilot on one group

    Select a single group from the register, preferably one with low regulatory exposure, and move its users onto the Open WebUI pilot. Test sign-in, group membership mapping, model access, file uploads, retrieval against approved knowledge sources, and conversation export. Compare results with the acceptance criteria written before the pilot starts, covering sign-in success, role mapping accuracy, data location and logging coverage. The output is a pilot acceptance report with each criterion marked as passed, failed or deferred. The step is done when the accountable owner accepts the report or the gaps are assigned to a named fix.

  5. Run a parallel period with a retention rule

    Keep the pilot group and the next groups working in both tools for a defined overlap, and tell users which tool holds the official record for each type of work. Apply the retention position from step two to new conversations in both systems, and watch for users who keep sensitive material only in ChatGPT. Track any gap in the Open WebUI logs or backups during this period. The output is a parallel-run log showing usage, issues and any data placed in the wrong tool. The step is done when the log shows no open retention gap and the owner confirms the overlap can close.

  6. Cut over each group with SSO and SCIM

    Move the remaining groups in waves, enabling OIDC or LDAP sign-in and SCIM 2.0 provisioning for each wave so that group membership and role-based access stay in step with your identity provider. Before each wave, confirm that every GPT or shared assistant has a documented equivalent, and that the users in that group can reach their knowledge collections. Disable ChatGPT access for the group only after its conversation export has completed. The output is a signed cutover checklist per group covering identity, permissions, export and user communication. The step is done when every group has a signed checklist.

  7. Decommission the ChatGPT Enterprise workspace

    Once every group is live on Open WebUI and the retention obligations in the signed position are satisfied, remove remaining users, revoke admin access and confirm with OpenAI how deleted conversations are handled under its enterprise privacy terms. Keep the audit evidence from the export and cutover records under your own retention rule, and archive the inventory register with the signed checklists. Ask your compliance advisor or auditor which evidence they expect to see before closing the workspace. The output is a decommission record that lists the closure date, the admin who closed the workspace and where each piece of evidence is stored. The step is done when that record is signed.

Choosing API or self-hosted models and the Open WebUI License

Pointing Open WebUI at a hosted provider is the fastest path to a working assistant. Open WebUI connects to Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic or any OpenAI-compatible provider from a single interface, so the chat layer stays the same if the model source changes. The trade-off is that prompts and retrieved content leave your infrastructure for the provider's service, which needs review against your data residency and contract terms.

  • Data path: Prompts and retrieved context are sent to the provider, so the provider's retention, training and region terms apply to that traffic.
  • Cost driver: Charges are usually metered by tokens or requests, so cost follows usage rather than seat count. Ask for the expected monthly token volume in any quote.
  • Key handling: Store provider keys in Open WebUI's administrative settings or your secrets manager, and restrict who can create API keys.
  • Compatibility: Confirm that the chosen provider supports the endpoints and streaming behavior your users need before you rely on it.
  • Exit path: Keep the model list and prompts portable so you can move to a self-hosted runtime later.

Before rollout, confirm the provider's current data processing terms and whether your chosen region applies to inference, not only storage.

Running ChatGPT Enterprise and Open WebUI in parallel without splitting history

The parallel run should be planned as a period with a fixed end, and the most important decision is which users stay on which tool for that period. Assign users by team or group rather than by individual request, so that each group has one place to work. Keep the list of who is on Open WebUI in the same place as your group mappings, because the same groups will later drive roles and access in the self-hosted deployment. Users who need a long-running project in ChatGPT Enterprise should finish it there rather than start it again in Open WebUI, and you should record that exception in the cutover plan.

Tell users in writing where new conversations now live and where old ones remain. Be explicit that conversations created in ChatGPT Enterprise are not copied into Open WebUI automatically, and that any history you need to keep must come from an export you have arranged. Ask the team to avoid pasting the same work into both tools, since two partial histories are harder to audit than one. Confirm with your OpenAI account team how the Compliance API export will be run for the admin who holds that access, and who receives the output.

Decide the retention policy before the parallel run ends, not after. OpenAI documents that deleted conversations are removed from its systems within 30 days unless legally required, so any deletion you request during the run starts a clock that your legal hold and records rules must account for. Set the freeze date on a calendar, stop new workspace-level deletions for affected users from that date, and export the final state of the ChatGPT Enterprise workspace before access is removed. Confirm your retention obligations with legal counsel and record the decision so that the self-hosted retention settings in Open WebUI match what you promised.

What drives cost and duration, and what to ask for in a quote

Who gets paid for what when moving from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI?

The cost splits across four payees: the infrastructure provider, the model provider (GPUs you run or API usage you pay for), the people who operate the stack, and any implementation partner. ChatGPT Enterprise is a per-seat subscription to OpenAI, which hosts everything. Open WebUI itself is free to run under the Open WebUI License, so the recurring spend moves to servers, inference and staff time. Ask every quote to show these lines separately so you can see which ones your own team would absorb.

What recurs after go-live and what is a one-time project cost?

One-time work includes discovery, data export, SSO and group mapping, initial configuration, testing and documentation. Recurring costs include compute and storage, GPU or API consumption, backups, patching, Open WebUI upgrades, monitoring and support hours. Open WebUI publishes frequent releases, so budget for regular upgrade testing rather than a single rollout. Ask the quote to label each line as one-time or recurring and to state the assumed release cadence.

How does model choice change the cost of running Open WebUI?

Model choice is the largest variable. Open WebUI connects to OpenAI-compatible APIs and to Ollama, so you can pay per token for a hosted API or run open models on your own hardware. Self-hosted inference shifts cost to GPUs, power, and capacity planning; Ollama's own pricing states that running models on your own hardware is unlimited, though hardware is still your cost. For concurrency, Ollama defaults to one parallel request per model, and vLLM needs accelerator capacity sized for peak load. Ask the quote to model usage at your expected seat count and to name the inference option it assumes.

What does multi-instance hosting add to the infrastructure bill?

A single Open WebUI instance is simpler, but larger rollouts need more components. The scaling guide requires PostgreSQL instead of SQLite for multi-instance deployments, and multiple replicas need Redis for shared state plus shared file storage so uploads and knowledge stay reachable from every replica. Each of these adds hosting, backup and patching work. Ask whether the quote includes high availability, and which components are managed services versus self-run.

Which licensing costs apply to Open WebUI at my user count?

The Open WebUI License keeps the standard branding in place for deployments of up to 50 users in any rolling 30-day period. Above that threshold, altering or removing branding requires an enterprise license or written contributor permission. Enterprise licenses are quoted after contacting sales with an expected seat count, and pricing is not published. Ask your counsel to review the license against your user forecast, and ask the vendor for a written quote that states what it covers, including white-labeling and support.

What drives the cost of identity integration and group mapping?

Identity work depends on how many identity sources you have and how cleanly groups map to roles. Open WebUI documents SSO through OIDC and LDAP, SCIM 2.0 provisioning, and role-based access control with groups and per-resource permissions. Costs rise with custom claim mapping, multiple identity providers, and cleanup of inconsistent groups. Ask the quote to list each identity source, the group-to-role mapping it assumes, and who signs off on access reviews.

What should a quote for conversation data migration include?

Migration effort depends on what you export and how much you need to keep. ChatGPT Enterprise admins can retrieve conversations and GPT records through the Enterprise Compliance API, and OpenAI states that deleted conversations are removed within 30 days unless legally required. Scope the work by volume of history, retention rules you must honor, audit log requirements, and whether attachments are included. Ask the quote to state the export method, the target schema, how it verifies completeness, and what is excluded.

Can we do this migration ourselves, and what should we ask a partner to cover?

Many teams can run Open WebUI with in-house staff, especially if they already operate containers and identity systems. The decision depends on skills, time available, and how much compliance evidence you need. DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades, documents and supports self-hosted platforms in your own infrastructure, and most engagements are fixed-scope with agreed deliverables and timelines in writing. Ask any provider for a written scope listing deliverables, responsibilities, support hours and handover, and confirm which compliance evidence they prepare versus what your auditor issues.

What usually goes wrong in this migration and how to prevent it

Most failed Open WebUI migrations trace back to a handful of gaps: exports that do not cover what teams expected, access that follows the wrong groups, and a deployment that works in a pilot but not at scale. The cards below pair each risk with a check to run before cutover, so the parallel-running period does not become a retention or compliance problem.

Incomplete export expectations

The Compliance API gives admins a documented path to conversations and an audit log of conversations and GPTs, but teams often assume it also returns files, memory, shared links or uploaded knowledge in a form Open WebUI can import. Before the migration starts, write down exactly which data classes you need, test a full export for one user, and confirm with OpenAI what the export omits. Plan for gaps in the export, not a clean copy.

Group mapping errors

If Entra ID or your identity provider groups do not map cleanly to Open WebUI groups, users can land with more model, knowledge or admin access than they had in ChatGPT Enterprise. Open WebUI supports SSO through OIDC and LDAP, SCIM 2.0 provisioning and role-based access control with per-resource permissions, so the mapping is a deliberate design step. Check it with a test user in each group and confirm that removed users lose access on the next sync.

SQLite with several replicas

Open WebUI's default local database works for a single instance, but the scaling guide requires PostgreSQL for multi-instance deployments because SQLite does not handle concurrent writes from multiple processes well. Teams that scale out before switching databases see lost or failed writes that look like random application errors. Build the environment on PostgreSQL from day one if more than one replica is planned, and do not run multiple replicas against SQLite.

Missing Redis or shared storage

A multi-replica Open WebUI deployment needs Redis for shared sessions, websocket connections and application state, plus shared file storage so uploads and knowledge stay reachable from every replica. Without them, users get logged out or lose websocket streams when a request lands on another replica, and uploaded documents return errors. Test a rolling restart and a file upload across replicas before any user is moved over.

Unauthenticated Ollama exposed to the network

The local Ollama API on port 11434 does not require authentication, and it binds to 127.0.0.1 by default. Teams that change OLLAMA_HOST to reach it from other hosts, or publish the port through a container, expose every model to anyone on that network. Keep Ollama on a private interface, place a reverse proxy with authentication in front of it, and confirm from a separate machine that the port is unreachable.

Branding clause missed at scale

The Open WebUI License forbids removing or altering branding in deployments above 50 users in a rolling 30-day period unless the operator holds an enterprise license or written contributor permission. Many pilots stay under that threshold, then the user count grows after rollout and the branding is already customized. Record the active user count monthly, decide before launch whether you will stay under the limit or request an enterprise license, and check the LICENSE file for the version you deploy.

Retention gaps during parallel running

While users work in both ChatGPT Enterprise and Open WebUI, conversations are created in two systems with different retention rules. OpenAI states that deleted Enterprise conversations are removed within 30 days unless legally required, but your Open WebUI retention depends on your own database and backup settings. Set a written retention policy for each system, decide which holds apply during the overlap, and confirm the cutover date with legal and records owners.

How the migration differs by size and starting point

A single department on a pilot seat count is the lowest-risk way to learn how Open WebUI behaves against your identity provider, your retention rules and your model choices. At this size, a single Docker or Docker Compose host with the default settings is often enough to validate the workflow, and the Open WebUI License's branding clause is unlikely to matter yet because it applies only above 50 users in a rolling 30-day period.

  • Scope the pilot in writing: name the user group, the use cases and the data classes allowed, so the exit test is concrete.
  • Start on SQLite only for a single instance: plan to move to PostgreSQL before any second replica is added, as the scaling guide requires.
  • Pick one model path first: a local runtime such as Ollama or an API-based OpenAI-compatible provider, and record the cost drivers of that choice.
  • Export the ChatGPT Enterprise history you need: pull conversations through the Enterprise Compliance API before the pilot users stop using the old workspace.
  • Track the user count from day one: a pilot that grows past 50 users in any rolling 30-day period changes the licensing position, so count it.

Before you expand, confirm the rolling 30-day user count against the wording in the Open WebUI License and decide whether you will need an enterprise license or keep the branding.

Questions buyers ask before moving from ChatGPT Enterprise

What does it cost to move from ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI?

The cost splits into components that are paid to different parties. Open WebUI itself is open source, so the software line is zero unless you buy an enterprise license for branding or support. The recurring costs are the servers or cloud accounts that host the interface, the database and shared storage, the model inference (either GPUs you own or per-token API charges from a model provider), and the staff time to patch and upgrade. The one-time costs are the migration work, SSO and group mapping, and testing. The biggest swing factor is inference: a per-seat subscription is replaced by hardware or metered API spend that scales with usage, not headcount. Ask any implementation partner for a quote that lists each component separately, with the assumed user count, usage volume and the hours for migration, identity integration and operations handover.

How long does a ChatGPT Enterprise to Open WebUI migration take?

No supplied source gives a duration for this migration, so treat any single number with caution. The timeline depends on the number of workspaces and users, how much conversation history must be carried over, how many identity groups need mapping, whether models run on local GPUs or through an API, and how many environments (test, staging, production) you need. Multi-replica deployments add work, since Open WebUI's scaling guide calls for PostgreSQL, Redis and shared file storage before more than one instance runs. Ask for a written scope with deliverables and milestones before work starts, because fixed-scope engagements are agreed in writing at the outset.

What does the migration need from our identity, security and platform teams?

Each team has a distinct role. Identity teams need to confirm how users sign in today and which provider will be the source of truth. Open WebUI documents SSO through OIDC and LDAP, plus SCIM 2.0 user and group provisioning and role-based access control with groups and per-resource permissions, so the mapping of ChatGPT Enterprise groups to Open WebUI groups must be agreed before cutover. Security teams should review API key handling, authenticator-app MFA, and how model endpoints are exposed. Platform teams own the hosting: container or Kubernetes runtime, PostgreSQL, Redis, object storage, backups and monitoring. If you plan to serve Ollama or vLLM locally, the model endpoints need network isolation, since the local Ollama API does not require authentication and vLLM's documentation recommends a reverse proxy that allowlists only user-facing endpoints.

Can our internal team run this migration without outside help?

A capable internal team can run it, provided it has people with Linux and container operations experience, identity administration skills and someone who owns the model stack. The migration itself is mostly configuration and data movement, but the skills gap usually appears in three places: getting a multi-replica deployment right, hardening model endpoints, and keeping the system patched after go-live. Open WebUI releases are frequent, with v0.12.3 published on October 16, 2026, so an upgrade process is a recurring duty, not a one-time task. Decide early whether your team will own upgrades, or whether a retainer for ongoing support and upgrades makes more sense. DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades and documents self-hosted platforms in your own infrastructure, and most engagements are fixed-scope with the scope agreed in writing.

How does the Compliance API export work, and what are its limits?

Workspace admins can view, export and delete end user conversations, and they can reach an audit log of conversations and GPTs through OpenAI's Enterprise Compliance API, which is the documented export path for ChatGPT Enterprise data. Plan the export as a sequence: confirm which admin roles can call the API, pull conversations and GPT records, store them in a location you control, and then import the history into Open WebUI where your format allows it. Check the limits before you rely on the export: the documented path covers what admins can retrieve, so anything outside it, such as certain attachments or workspace settings, may need a manual process. Also note that OpenAI's documented retention behavior removes deleted conversations within 30 days unless legally required, so align your export timing with any deletion schedule. Confirm the exact export fields with OpenAI before you build the import job.

What happens to the Open WebUI License above 50 users?

Since v0.6.6, Open WebUI is distributed under the Open WebUI License, which is BSD-3-Clause style with a branding protection clause. The clause forbids removing or altering Open WebUI branding in deployments that exceed 50 users in any rolling 30-day period, unless you hold an enterprise license or written contributor permission. Code through v0.6.5 remains under BSD-3-Clause. Above 50 users, the practical question is whether you must keep the branding as delivered. If you want white-labeling or custom branding, the enterprise license covers it, and pricing is not published, so you request a quote from enterprise sales with an expected seat count. Have legal counsel read the license text and the history file before you commit, and confirm how your user count is measured.

Which models should we use: API providers or self-hosted models?

The choice comes down to data handling, usage volume and operations capacity. Open WebUI connects to Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic or any OpenAI-compatible provider from a single interface, so you can mix models. Using an API provider avoids GPU purchases but sends prompts to that provider, so review its data terms and your residency needs. Self-hosted models keep prompts inside your environment: Ollama runs locally and does not see your prompts or data when used that way, and it can run on macOS, Windows, Linux or Docker, while vLLM suits larger shared serving on GPUs and exposes OpenAI-compatible endpoints. Consider Ollama's documented concurrency defaults, such as one parallel request per model, before sizing a shared service. Define the model policy in the scope so you can cost each route.

How DeployOpen scopes, runs and supports this migration

DeployOpen plans, implements, integrates, hardens, backs up, upgrades, documents and supports self-hosted Open WebUI inside your own cloud accounts, data centers or air-gapped network. For this migration, the written scope usually has to settle the same concrete questions: which ChatGPT Enterprise data is pulled through the Compliance API and into what store, how SSO and SCIM group mappings are configured for Open WebUI roles, which model endpoints are used (an API provider or self-hosted Ollama or vLLM), where PostgreSQL, Redis and shared file storage run for multiple replicas, and who owns the Open WebUI License branding decision once the deployment passes 50 users in a rolling 30-day period. Ask for each of these to be listed as a named deliverable, not as a general statement of intent.

Most engagements are fixed-scope. Scope, deliverables and timelines are agreed in writing before work starts, and a quote follows from that written scope. Cost is driven by the number of integrations, the amount of historical data to migrate and validate, the model hosting choice, the number of environments, and the evidence your assessors expect. Ask any provider, including DeployOpen, to separate one-time implementation and migration work from recurring items such as hosting, model capacity, upgrades and support, and to state which party pays for each. Confirm also who performs the Open WebUI upgrades and patch cycles after cutover, since that work recurs.

Ongoing support, upgrades and continuous testing are available as retainers, which suit teams that want a named party to apply Open WebUI releases and review the access and logging setup over time. DeployOpen prepares systems, controls and evidence for compliance assessments, but it does not issue audit reports, attestations or certifications. Independent auditors and certification bodies perform those assessments, so your readiness file should be reviewed by them before you rely on it. Confirm with your assessor which evidence they will accept before the migration begins.

Talk to our team.

Tell us what you're working on, whether it's a deployment, an audit, a security test or a cyber range. You'll speak with an engineer who can help you scope it.

  • 30-minute call: free, with no obligation.
  • NDA on request: we can sign before you share details.
  • Clear next steps: a scope and plan after the call.